Elementor Theme Builder Reviews

1. Beard

   10 months ago
   If you make a site on Wordpress - only with Elementor.

   Using Elementor for my website design has been a game-changing experience. The drag-and-drop interface offers a level of convenience and user-friendliness that is superior to the default WordPress editor. It is remarkably intuitive and saves a significant amount of time in designing and adjusting web pages. The vast selection of widgets and templates at my disposal has opened up a world of possibilities for my website, and the fact that it requires no coding makes it accessible, even for a non-technical person like myself. The compatibility with most WordPress themes and plugins adds to the overall seamless experience.Compared to the standard WordPress design tools, Elementor stands out as a more advanced, efficient, and user-centric solution. It's certainly made my website design process much more enjoyable and productive. I highly recommend Elementor to anyone looking to elevate their WordPress website design experience.

   👍 Pros:    Fast|Drag and drop website builder

   👎 Cons:    Price

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

Elementor Theme Builder mentions (1)

• [HELP] Looking for a directory plugin

  If you are using a traditional theme, some page builders have the ability to add post and archive templates. Most popular is Elementor Pro. This includes ACF support. I have never added a post list based on an ACF relationship here but I expect it is possible. Source: about 1 year ago

Apache HTTP Server mentions (50)

• The 2024 Web Hosting Report

  Single-page applications (SPAs) existed before S3, but given that you still had to set up, scale, and maintain servers using something like Apache or NGINX in order to serve them, the advantages for “Ops” or “DevOps” were not so different to running a “real server” with a language like PHP, python, or Java. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  Both Docusaurus and Starlight generate static sites. This means that theoretically, they can be deployed on any platform that supports deploying static sites (like Apache or NGINX). But both of them provide a significantly better developer experience if we deploy on their recommended platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• BCHS stack: BSD, C, httpd, SQLite

  Simiplicity is nice, but there are reasons why Perl and PHP were the popular choices for web stacks in the early 2000's--they are faster and easier to develop with than C and likely safer than C too. Mod_perl (https://perl.apache.org/) and mod_php (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=115522403#content/view/115522403) helped to make Apache httpd (https://httpd.apache.org/) the... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Apache HTTP Server: An Overview of the Open Source Web Server for Multiple Platforms

  The Apache HTTP Server project was initially launched in 1995 by a group of web developers and administrators who sought to improve upon the existing web server software available at the time. The project has since evolved into a collaborative effort, with contributors from around the world working together to maintain and enhance the server. Today, the Apache HTTP Server is managed by the Apache Software... Source: about 1 year ago

• Selfmade PVE-Rack

  Apache websites of friends and acquaintances. Source: about 1 year ago