Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

EJS VS Typeahead.js

Compare EJS VS Typeahead.js and see what are their differences

EJS logo EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.

Typeahead.js logo Typeahead.js

Typehead.js is a flexible javascript library that provides a foundation for building robust typeaheads.
  • EJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11
  • Typeahead.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-07

EJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

Typeahead.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of EJS

Overall verdict

  • Yes, EJS is considered good, particularly for projects where developers want ease of use and flexibility with JavaScript templating. It is lightweight, easy to learn, and integrates well with Express, a popular Node.js web application framework.

Why this product is good

  • EJS (Embedded JavaScript Templating) is popular because it provides a simple way to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. It allows for the embedding of JavaScript logic within your HTML templates, making it straightforward to use for those familiar with JavaScript. It's known for its efficiency in rendering templates and ease of integration with Node.js applications.

Recommended for

    EJS is recommended for developers building server-side web applications using Node.js and those looking for a simple, yet effective, templating solution. It is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized projects where dynamic content generation is needed and for teams that prioritize simplicity and performance.

EJS videos

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Typeahead.js videos

Add Search to Ghost using Twitter's Typeahead.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EJS and Typeahead.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
88 88%
12% 12
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Front-End Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using EJS and Typeahead.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, EJS should be more popular than Typeahead.js. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EJS mentions (26)

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
    The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Typeahead.js mentions (3)

  • Best Chrome Extensions to boost GitHub
    This extension continually pulls data about active repositories and users from the GitHub Archive dataset and saves it in two separate Algolia indices - 'users' and 'repositories.' When a user starts a search, the results are received using Algolia's JavaScript API client and presented on the UI which leverages Twitter's typeahead.js library to display the auto-completion menu. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • Initial Thoughts on a Zulip's Issue
    Based on an existing approach to a relatively similar feature, I need to customize the existing typeahead.js's layout to include an avatar for any suggested person or organization. As the author of the issue suggested, I could reuse a Handlebars partial for each suggestion. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Bootstrap 5 Released
    Bootstrap 2 had a typeahead but it was removed in BS 3. (Possibly in favor of twitter typeahead which was more active at the time.) https://getbootstrap.com/2.0.0/javascript.html#typeahead https://twitter.github.io/typeahead.js/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EJS and Typeahead.js, you can also consider the following products

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Underscore.js - Underscore is a utility-belt library for JavaScript that provides a lot of the functional...

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and …

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React