Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Editor.js VS Quoty

Compare Editor.js VS Quoty and see what are their differences

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output

Quoty logo Quoty

A WordPress plugin for sharing selected text
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Quoty Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-01

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Quoty features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Quoty offers a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to integrate quotes into their WordPress websites without requiring extensive technical knowledge or experience.
  • Customization Options
    The plugin provides various customization features, allowing users to style quotes and tailor them to fit the design and theme of their website effectively.
  • Responsive Design
    Quotes added through Quoty are designed to be responsive, ensuring that they display correctly on different devices, including mobile phones, tablets, and desktops.
  • Quick Setup
    Quoty can be installed and set up quickly, streamlining the process of adding quote functionality to a WordPress site, saving time for users.
  • Lightweight Plugin
    This plugin is lightweight, which means it won't significantly affect the loading speed or performance of the WordPress website it's installed on.

Possible disadvantages of Quoty

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Quoty is effective for basic quote management, it might lack more advanced features that users might be looking for, such as integration with third-party apps or automation tools.
  • Support and Updates
    As with many free plugins, there might be limited support and fewer updates, which can be a concern for users looking for long-term, reliable maintenance.
  • Dependency on WordPress
    Quoty being a WordPress plugin means it is only usable within the WordPress ecosystem, limiting its usefulness for users operating on different website platforms.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Some users might encounter compatibility issues with certain themes or other plugins, which can require additional troubleshooting or technical support.

Analysis of Editor.js

Overall verdict

  • Editor.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a flexible, modern content editing solution that prioritizes structured data. It is particularly beneficial for projects where content needs to be presented in various ways or integrated with complex data models. However, it might not be the best fit for those seeking a traditional, more intuitive text editing experience out-of-the-box.

Why this product is good

  • Editor.js is designed to be a block-styled editor, which provides a clean and flexible way to handle content. It focuses on modern use cases such as creating structured data content, offering a unique approach compared to traditional WYSIWYG editors. Its emphasis on separation of data and views makes it easy to present the content in different formats. Additionally, it offers a highly pluggable architecture, enabling developers to extend its functionality with custom blocks.

Recommended for

  • Developers building applications requiring structured data
  • Projects where content must be easily re-purposed or presented differently
  • Teams who benefit from a highly customizable and extendable editor
  • Use cases involving complex integrations with data-driven systems

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Quoty videos

No Quoty videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Editor.js and Quoty)
Text Editors
85 85%
15% 15
Rich Text Editor
79 79%
21% 21
IDEs And Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
React
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Editor.js and Quoty. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Editor.js and Quoty

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

Quoty Reviews

We have no reviews of Quoty yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Editor.js and Quoty, you can also consider the following products

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Genius Beta - Annotate the Internet

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Draft.js - Rich Text Editor Framework for React

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

MediumEditor - MediumEditor is a simple inline editor toolbar built with JavaScript.