Editor.js VS Portable C Compiler

Compare Editor.js VS Portable C Compiler and see what are their differences

Warmup Inbox

Warmup Inbox is a tool that automates the process of warming up your email inboxes, raising your sender reputation and inbox health automatically. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output

Portable C Compiler

pcc is a C99 compiler which aims to be small, simple, fast and understandable.

Landing page //
2021-09-24

Landing page //
2019-11-06

Portable C Compiler

Website: pcc.ludd.ltu.se

Edit details

Editor.js features and specs

Modular Architecture
Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
Block Style Editor
The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
Clean JSON Output
Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
API Flexibility
Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
Lightweight & Fast
The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
Open Source
As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
Rich Plugin Ecosystem
A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

Steep Learning Curve
While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
Limited Built-In Tools
Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
Dependency on JavaScript
Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
Plugin Compatibility
Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
Configuration Complexity
Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
Lack of Native Features
Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
Accessibility Concerns
Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Portable C Compiler features and specs

Simplicity
PCC is designed to be simple and easy to understand, making it a good choice for educational purposes and for those learning about compilers.
Portability
As its name suggests, PCC is portable and can be easily adapted to different machine architectures, allowing for broad platform support.
Small Size
PCC has a smaller code base compared to other compilers like GCC, which makes it more lightweight and quicker to compile.
Legacy Code Support
PCC is useful for compiling older C code that may not comply with modern C standards, providing support for legacy systems.

Possible disadvantages of Portable C Compiler

Limited Features
PCC may lack some of the advanced features and optimizations found in more modern compilers like GCC or Clang.
Performance
The performance of code compiled with PCC may not be as optimized as that compiled with other contemporary compilers.
Community and Support
PCC has a smaller community and less active development compared to larger projects, potentially leading to fewer updates and less troubleshooting support.
Standard Compliance
PCC may not fully support the latest C standards, which could be a limitation for projects that need to adhere to modern specifications.

Analysis of Editor.js

Overall verdict

Editor.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a flexible, modern content editing solution that prioritizes structured data. It is particularly beneficial for projects where content needs to be presented in various ways or integrated with complex data models. However, it might not be the best fit for those seeking a traditional, more intuitive text editing experience out-of-the-box.

Why this product is good

Editor.js is designed to be a block-styled editor, which provides a clean and flexible way to handle content. It focuses on modern use cases such as creating structured data content, offering a unique approach compared to traditional WYSIWYG editors. Its emphasis on separation of data and views makes it easy to present the content in different formats. Additionally, it offers a highly pluggable architecture, enabling developers to extend its functionality with custom blocks.

Recommended for

Developers building applications requiring structured data
Projects where content must be easily re-purposed or presented differently
Teams who benefit from a highly customizable and extendable editor
Use cases involving complex integrations with data-driven systems

Editor.js videos

+ Add

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

Portable C Compiler videos

No Portable C Compiler videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Editor.js and Portable C Compiler)

Portable C Compiler

Text Editors

75 75%

Text Editors

25% 25

IDE

0 0%

IDE

100% 100

Rich Text Editor

100 100%

Rich Text Editor

0% 0

Project Management

0 0%

Project Management

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Editor.js and Portable C Compiler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Editor.js and Portable C Compiler

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors

Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.

Source: itsfoss.com

Portable C Compiler Reviews

We have no reviews of Portable C Compiler yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Portable C Compiler seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Editor.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Editor.js yet. Tracking of Editor.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Portable C Compiler mentions (2)

Hand-optimizing the TCC code generator
Check PCC [1]. Official release was 2014, but development still active [2]. [1] http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Research Unix v7 for Raspberry Pi
Works for me in qemu, but remember to provide an SD card image as mentioned in the README before you run "make tools/sd.img" - e.g. The one in the releases https://github.com/r1mikey/research-unix-v7/releases/download/v7-unix-pi1-20200212/v7-unix-pi1-20200212.img.xz Otherwise, qemu will start up complaining about a large number of invalid memory accesses. Unfortunately, there is no port of pcc (the portable C... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago