Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Editor.js VS openWYSIWYG

Compare Editor.js VS openWYSIWYG and see what are their differences

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output

openWYSIWYG logo openWYSIWYG

A free, open-source cross-browser WYSIWYG editor that’s full of every rich-text editing feature you need to make your content management system (CMS) better
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • openWYSIWYG Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-04

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

openWYSIWYG features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    OpenWYSIWYG provides an intuitive interface that allows users to create and edit web content without needing extensive HTML knowledge.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    It is designed to work across different web browsers, ensuring consistent performance and appearance across platforms.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, OpenWYSIWYG allows users to modify and customize the code to fit their specific needs without any licensing fees.
  • Lightweight
    The editor is lightweight, which means it loads quickly and doesn't put much strain on web servers.
  • Control Customization
    It offers customizable toolbars and editors, meaning developers can tailor the WYSIWYG interface to match their application's needs.

Possible disadvantages of openWYSIWYG

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to other more modern WYSIWYG editors, OpenWYSIWYG may lack some advanced functionalities, such as sophisticated plugin ecosystems or collaborative editing capabilities.
  • Community and Support
    Being an open-source project, it might not have a dedicated support team, meaning users may need to rely on community forums for help.
  • Potential Security Risks
    Open source projects can have potential vulnerabilities if not regularly updated and maintained, leading to security risks.
  • Outdated Technology
    OpenWYSIWYG might not utilize the latest web technologies, potentially leading to issues with compatibility and performance.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is possible, it might be complex for users unfamiliar with coding or those who lack the resources for development.

Analysis of Editor.js

Overall verdict

  • Editor.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a flexible, modern content editing solution that prioritizes structured data. It is particularly beneficial for projects where content needs to be presented in various ways or integrated with complex data models. However, it might not be the best fit for those seeking a traditional, more intuitive text editing experience out-of-the-box.

Why this product is good

  • Editor.js is designed to be a block-styled editor, which provides a clean and flexible way to handle content. It focuses on modern use cases such as creating structured data content, offering a unique approach compared to traditional WYSIWYG editors. Its emphasis on separation of data and views makes it easy to present the content in different formats. Additionally, it offers a highly pluggable architecture, enabling developers to extend its functionality with custom blocks.

Recommended for

  • Developers building applications requiring structured data
  • Projects where content must be easily re-purposed or presented differently
  • Teams who benefit from a highly customizable and extendable editor
  • Use cases involving complex integrations with data-driven systems

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

openWYSIWYG videos

OpenWYSIWYG, Installation And Use The Script, Software Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Editor.js and openWYSIWYG)
Text Editors
69 69%
31% 31
Rich Text Editor
70 70%
30% 30
IDEs And Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
WYSIWYG Editor
55 55%
45% 45

User comments

Share your experience with using Editor.js and openWYSIWYG. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Editor.js and openWYSIWYG

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

openWYSIWYG Reviews

We have no reviews of openWYSIWYG yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Editor.js and openWYSIWYG, you can also consider the following products

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Aloha Editor - Aloha Editor is an HTML5 WYSIWYG Editor that gives you a total new experience when editing.

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

Froala Editor - Froala Editor is a WYSIWYG HTML editor that enables rich text editing capabilities for the applications.

Summernote - Summernote is a JavaScript library that helps users create WYSIWYG editors online.