Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Editor.js VS Cleartext

Compare Editor.js VS Cleartext and see what are their differences

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output

Cleartext logo Cleartext

A text editor that allows only the 1,000 most common words
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Cleartext Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Cleartext features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Cleartext is designed to encourage simple writing by warning users when they use complex vocabulary, thus making written content more accessible and easier to understand.
  • Focused Writing
    By highlighting complex words, Cleartext helps writers focus on clarity and precision, avoiding unnecessary jargon or verbose language.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application offers a clean and minimalistic interface, which enhances the user experience by reducing distractions while writing.

Possible disadvantages of Cleartext

  • Limited Application
    Cleartext's primary function is to alert users about complex words, which might not be suitable for technical documents or content requiring specific terminology.
  • Over-Simplification
    The application may encourage oversimplification, which might not be ideal for all types of writing, such as literature or academic papers, where nuanced language can be essential.
  • Platform Limitation
    As of now, Cleartext is available only for macOS, restricting its accessibility to users of other operating systems like Windows or Linux.

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Cleartext videos

No Cleartext videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Editor.js and Cleartext)
Text Editors
53 53%
47% 47
Rich Text Editor
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
IDEs And Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Editor.js and Cleartext. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Editor.js and Cleartext

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

Cleartext Reviews

We have no reviews of Cleartext yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Editor.js and Cleartext, you can also consider the following products

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Trix - A rich text editor for everyday writing.

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft