Earthly VS Buildbot

Make is excellent if you use it properly to model your dependencies. This works really well for languages like C/C++, but I think Make really struggles with languages like Go, JavaScript, and Python or when your using a large combination of technologies. I've found Earthly [0] to be the _perfect_ tool to replace Make. It's a familiar syntax (combination of Dockerfiles + Makefiles). Every target is run in an... - Source: Hacker News / 8 days ago

Earthly solves this really well: https://earthly.dev They rethink Dockerfiles with really good caching support. - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago

Earthly https://earthly.dev/ Fast, consistent builds with an instantly familiar syntax – like Dockerfile and Makefile had a baby. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

We are big fans of https://earthly.dev/! Although we haven't personally used Dagger, Earthly has solved our multi-service integration testing problem with elegance. Simple builds + caching baked in. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

This one is ridiculous. This should already exist. Until GitHub builds it, you can use GitHub Actions to kick your builds off but run them remotely on Earthly Cloud (https://earthly.dev/). Even the free tier includes arm64 remote runners. Note: I work at Earthly, but I'm not wrong about this being a good, free, arm64-native workflow for GitHub Actions. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 1 year ago

If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 1 year ago

Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 1 year ago

I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago