Dynu Dynamic DNS VS Babel

Dynu Dynamic DNS Reviews

1. Niklas Rundgren    

   Working at Pi Panda | over 2 years ago
   Im very happy with dynu their prices are too.

   They have good support and membership is roughly $10 per year, which is really cheap. And as member you get 15% off on the services.

Babel Reviews

Dynu Dynamic DNS mentions (19)

• Self Hosted Email without port forwarding

  Email relay, I usd dynu.com for a few years and it works weell:. Source: about 1 year ago

• DDNS recommendations which provide subdomains

  I use dynu it's realy easy to set up subdomains. Source: over 1 year ago

• am i using the correct one ? its safe right?

  Do you have any idea it's possible to configure adguard DNS provider directly in Razer Sila router ? I can only select predefined providers like: - dyn.com - noip.com - dynu.com - mydns.jp - domains.google.com. Source: over 1 year ago

• Can anyone access ipv6 website through servicies like dynu?

  Hello. This is probably a question that has been answered before, but after searching all night, I could not find an answer to my exact situation. *I am doing all this to learn*. I have a small web site hosted on a LAMP server at home. I can access it from computers inside the network, now I wanted to see if I could get it online for the world, I was going to do it with dynu.com, but noticed that my ISP provided... Source: over 1 year ago

• How bad is QuickConnect?

  I'm using a Dynamic DNS service (dynu.com) in conjunction with WireGuard for remote access to my setup, running alongside a dnsmasq configuration to bring my LAN devices to the same IP addresses when away from my network. These services run on a DietPi VM hosted on my 920+. Most of the time the setup just works; on one occasion, however, the VM did not start automatically. I was glad I have QC set up: I could... Source: over 1 year ago

Babel mentions (134)

• How, and why, you should add JavaScript linting to your project. With ESLint and Gulp

  Some of the most popular JavaScript linting tools are ESLint, JSHint, JSLint and JSCS. We're going to be using ESLint. It’s very flexible, easy to use and has the best ES6 support, which will be helpful if we introduce more modern JavaScript (that will be transpiled for older browsers using https://babeljs.io/). All rules for ESLint can be found here: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• What is Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)?

  This simply extends the existing build process that many front-end frameworks have. After Babel's done with its transpilation, it merely executes code to compile your initial screen into static HTML and CSS. This isn't entirely dissimilar from how SSR hydrates your initial screen, but it's done at compile-time, not at request time. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Storybook 8 Beta

  First, we switched the default compiler for new projects from Babel to SWC (Speedy Web Compiler). SWC is dramatically faster than Babel and requires zero configuration. We’ll continue to support Babel in any project currently using it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Nuxt vs Next: Which JavaScript Framework Suits Your Next Project?

  Nuxt.js is an open-source JavaScript framework built on Vue.js, Node.js, Vite, and Babel.js used for creating fast, cutting-edge applications. Nuxt.js possesses similar features to Next.js, with the major difference being the web framework it is compatible with. Next.js is a React framework whereas Nuxt.js is a Vue framework. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Abstract Syntax Trees and Practical Applications in JavaScript

  Disclaimer: If you've already developed Babel or ESLint plugins, this article may not be as beneficial for you, as you're likely already familiar with the majority of the content covered here. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago