Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

DotNetOpenAuth VS Google Authenticator

Compare DotNetOpenAuth VS Google Authenticator and see what are their differences

DotNetOpenAuth logo DotNetOpenAuth

DotNetOpenAuth is a free-to-use compiled library that comes with the real support to your site visitor to login with the help of openIDs via getting control of the ASP.NET control onto the page.

Google Authenticator logo Google Authenticator

Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.
  • DotNetOpenAuth Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-03
  • Google Authenticator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25

DotNetOpenAuth features and specs

  • Comprehensive Support
    DotNetOpenAuth supports multiple OAuth and OpenID versions, making it versatile for different authentication scenarios.
  • Security Features
    The library includes built-in features to handle security concerns, such as token encryption and secure transmission protocols.
  • Community and Documentation
    DotNetOpenAuth has a history of strong community support and extensive documentation, which can be helpful in learning and troubleshooting.
  • Integration with .NET Framework
    The library is designed to integrate seamlessly with the .NET framework, making it easy to implement in existing .NET applications.

Possible disadvantages of DotNetOpenAuth

  • Complexity and Learning Curve
    The library offers many features, which can make it complex and difficult to learn for newcomers.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    There have been concerns about the frequency of updates and maintenance, which might affect long-term usability and compatibility with new standards.
  • Limited .NET Core Support
    DotNetOpenAuth primarily targets the .NET Framework, with limited support for .NET Core, which may necessitate alternatives for modern applications.
  • Performance Overhead
    The extensive feature set can introduce performance overhead, particularly in scenarios that require lightweight solutions.

Google Authenticator features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Google Authenticator adds an extra layer of security by requiring a second factor of authentication, reducing the risk of unauthorized access even if your password is compromised.
  • Offline Access
    The app does not require an internet connection to generate codes, making it reliable in situations where connectivity is a concern.
  • Compatibility
    Google Authenticator is compatible with a wide range of services and accounts, providing a versatile solution for multi-factor authentication (MFA).
  • Free of Charge
    The application is free to use, offering robust security features without any financial investment.
  • Ease of Use
    Setup and usage are straightforward, making it accessible to users without technical expertise.

Possible disadvantages of Google Authenticator

  • Device Dependence
    If you lose your device, gaining access to your accounts can become challenging, particularly if you haven't backed up or used alternative methods.
  • No Cloud Sync
    Google Authenticator does not offer a built-in feature for cloud backups, making it difficult to transfer codes to a new device.
  • Single Device Limitation
    The app only works on a single device at a time, which can be inconvenient if you manage multiple devices.
  • No Biometric Lock
    The app lacks advanced security features such as biometric locks, which are present in some other authenticator apps.
  • Limited Recovery Options
    In case of losing access to the app, recovery options rely heavily on the user having access to backup codes, which might not always be accessible.

DotNetOpenAuth videos

No DotNetOpenAuth videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Google Authenticator videos

How to Use Google Authenticator

More videos:

  • Review - GOOGLE AUTHENTICATOR vs. AUTHY - (AUTHY WON)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DotNetOpenAuth and Google Authenticator)
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
Tool
100 100%
0% 0
Two Factor Authentication

User comments

Share your experience with using DotNetOpenAuth and Google Authenticator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare DotNetOpenAuth and Google Authenticator

DotNetOpenAuth Reviews

We have no reviews of DotNetOpenAuth yet.
Be the first one to post

Google Authenticator Reviews

7 Best Google Authenticator Alternatives For Android And iOS
Except for one, all the apps mentioned above are available for Android and iPhone. You can add accounts which you want to secure by scanning their barcode or simply entering the secret key or id in all of them. Some of them will let you capture a screenshot and some of them will not. Apart from that, all these are free to use and provide better features making them as the...
The Best Authenticator Apps for 2023
When you use Google Authenticator to log in to your Google account, you enter the six-digit code shown in the authenticator app, just as you would to log in to any other service. The app also lets you import logins from an old phone to a new one if you have the former on hand. As with Microsoft Authenticator, there's no Apple Watch app or even an Android Wear app for Google...
Source: www.pcmag.com
Top 6 Google Authenticator Alternatives in 2023
Although they aren’t as big or widely known as Google or Microsoft, Twilio’s Authy app is one of the most impressive and feature-rich Google Authenticator alternatives. Twilio takes pride in the fact that their app can be used anywhere Google Authenticator can be used, meaning that those making the switch won’t hit any unexpected compatibility issues.
Is Authy better than Google Authenticator?
The difference between Authy and Google Authenticator lies in the number of features offered by each app. If you like minimalism, use Google Authenticator, but if you like multi-device support, full Backup of your 2FA codes, or three authentication types, use Authy.
The Best 2FA Apps 2021: Locking Down Your Online Accounts
Google Authenticator is really the baseline here, because nearly all sites that support 2FA support Google’s app as well. For example, LastPass Authenticator and Authy aren’t explicitly supported by as many sites and services. However, they still use TOTP, making them compatible with all services that support Google Authenticator.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Authenticator should be more popular than DotNetOpenAuth. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

DotNetOpenAuth mentions (1)

  • OpenID Provider open source library
    But if the OpenID server would be for a intranet or low number of requests, you can go ahread (in my opinion) and the post also recommends http://dotnetopenauth.net/ because has a OpenID provider and samples. Source: over 2 years ago

Google Authenticator mentions (7)

  • Google Authenticator now supports Google Account synchronization
    Here they have support page https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1066447. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • I'm building a macOS app in a week with Tauri and Supabase.
    Many authenticator apps already exist on Google Play Store and Apple App Store. Most of them have synchronization features but are limited to backup only or sync with the same platform (ie: iOS or Android only). I'm using one of them for years and at this moment I'm feeling bothered when switching to a mobile device every time login into a website or online service. So, I created Otentik Authenticator. A Google... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: How to enable 2FA for Google Account to use Authenticator app?
    Their only docs suggest using an authenticator app (which presumably runs on the 'phone which potentially can be lost' anyway) is possible: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1066447?hl=en&ref_topic=2954345 If it's not showing up for you, you'd need to contact their support team to find out why. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Bought Centric Swap / CNS? Here’s What To Do Next
    By the way, if you don’t already have 2FA (Two-Factor Authentication) set up on your Centric Wallet, now would be a good time to do that. You’ll need to have a 2FA app installed on your smartphone, such as Google Authenticator or Authy. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Storing hex/pulse/pulse swap
    Use 2FA with Google Authenticator for your email, wallets, and pretty much anything else that allows you to do so. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DotNetOpenAuth and Google Authenticator, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET Identity - ASP.NET Identity is a membership-based software system designed for the authentication and authorization of the users via building an ASP.NET application.

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

OAuth - OAuth is an open standard for authorization. It allows users to share their private resources (e.g.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

ASP.NET SAML - ASP.NET SAML is an open-source authentication utility that has been used for exchanging authentication and authorization data between the channels.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication - Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.