Docusaurus
GitBook
Doxygen
MkDocs
ReadMe
Docsify.js
DocFX
Hugo
Laravel WebSockets
Ratchet
soketi
fish shell
Archbee.io
Documentator
Greenboard
Oh My Zsh
Docusaurus Laravel WebSocketsNo features have been listed yet.
Based on our record, Docusaurus seems to be a lot more popular than Laravel WebSockets. While we know about 210 links to Docusaurus, we've tracked only 10 mentions of Laravel WebSockets. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I think this is more a question of how you want to create and store your content and templates, like whether they exist as a bunch of Markdown files, database entries, a third-party API, etc. They're typically made to work in some sort of toolchain or ecosystem. For example, if you're working in the React world, Next.js can actually output static HTML pages that work fine without JS... Just use the pages router... - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago
For this challenge, I've built a simple static website based on Docusaurus for tutorials and blog posts. As I'm not too seasoned with Frontend development, I only made small changes to the template, and added some very simple blog posts and tutorials there. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Dumi. A static site generator specifically designed for component library development. Look at it as something between Storybook and Docusaurus inside the Umi world (but much better integrated between each other, presumably). - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Static site generators like Docusaurus offer Flexibility for teams comfortable with Markdown and Git workflows. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Static websites are so good that they even have their own three-letter abbreviation: SSG (Static Site Generation). And of course, there are plenty of frameworks that generate them for you, no need in manual labour: Next.js supports SSG, Gatsby is still pretty popular, lots of people love Docusaurus, Astro promises the best performance, and probably many more. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Which of these do you use for your realtime Laravel applications? Soketi seems good but documentation doesn't seem that good. Laravel Websockets is mentioned in the official Laravel docs as a Pusher alternative,and Laravel Echo Server looks good but hasn't been updated for a year. Source: over 2 years ago
Latavel websocket https://beyondco.de/docs/laravel-websockets/getting-started/introduction pure php implementation of pusher protocol. Source: over 2 years ago
I am trying implement Laravel's websockets using the documentation from BeyondCode's Websockets Pacakge that implements Pusher type connections. Source: over 2 years ago
Using Laravel Websockets, broadcast events are sent to Livewire components. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Events are broadcast using Laravel Echo Server, Laravel Websockets, or Soketi. Say on a channel time. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.
Ratchet - Build mobile apps with simple HTML, CSS, and JS components.
Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code
soketi - Your simple, fast, and resilient open-source WS server.
MkDocs - Project documentation with Markdown.
fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.
