Docusaurus VS JSDoc

Docusaurus Reviews

JSDoc Reviews

Docusaurus mentions (192)

• Alternatives to Docusaurus for product documentation

  Docusaurus is a popular open-source documentation tool primarily designed for product documentation and other technical documentation needs. It was first released in 2017 by Facebook Open Source (now Meta Open Source). Just recently, Docsaurus version 3.0 was released. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• Show HN: A Python-based static site generator using Jinja templates

  Facebook's React/Markdown SSG docusaurus does those things: https://docusaurus.io/ Though you may have to use a plugin for responsive images: https://docusaurus.io/docs/api/plugins/@docusaurus/plugin-ideal-image. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  Created by Facebook, Docusaurus is an open source static site generator built on top of React. Docusaurus is also used by several platforms like Redux, Ionic, Supabase, etc. To host their documentation. They recently released version 3.0 of the framework. The generator provides documentation-centric features like MDX support, versioning, translation, search, and loads of customization options. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Top 5 Open-Source Documentation Development Platforms of 2024

  Docusaurus is an open-source static site generator built on React and has emerged as a popular tool for developing and maintaining product documentation. Its ease of use, extensive features, and robust community support make it a compelling choice for many organizations. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• No CMS? Writing Our Blog in React

  Wondering why Docusaurus (https://docusaurus.io) did not match their needs. Works perfectly fine as a blogging engine for our tech blog. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

JSDoc mentions (49)

• Figma's Journey to TypeScript

  You may like JSDoc[1] if you just want some type-safety from the IDE without the compilation overhead. It’s done wonders when I’ve had to wrangle poorly commented legacy JavaScript codebases where most of the overhead is tracing what type the input parameters are. Personally, I’m impartial to TypeScript or JSDoc at this point. But I’d rather have either over plain JavaScript. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 days ago

• Eloquent JavaScript 4th edition (2024)

  I wholeheartedly agree. At most, I introduce JSDoc[1] to newer developers as standardising how parameters and whatnot are commented at least gets you better documentation and _some_ safety without adding any TS knowledge overhead. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• Add typing to your Javascript code (without Typescript, kinda) ✍🏼

  The best way to do this, of course, is with JSDoc. But something I always found awkward about jsdoc is defining the object types in the same file. So, after a lot of reading, I found a way to combine JSDoc with declaration type files from Typescript. Let me give you an example:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• What is JSDoc and why you may not need typescript for your next project?

  There is a lot of specific symbols presented on the JSDOC specification that can be found here: https://jsdoc.app. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• TypeScript Might Not Be Your God: Case Study of Migration from TS to JSDoc

  JSDoc is a specification for the comment format in JavaScript. This specification allows developers to describe the structure of their code, data types, function parameters, and much more using special comments. These comments can then be transformed into documentation using appropriate tools. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago