Docker Registry 2.0 VS Siberian CMS

Docker Registry 2.0 mentions (21)

• regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers

  Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example:... Source: 10 months ago

• regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers

  You can run your own docker registry if you want and push images to it: https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: 10 months ago

• gitea for container image regsitry

  You can self-host your own. There is many alternatives but the official one you can find in these docs here Https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: 12 months ago

• Docker registry: Harbor or Nexus?

  Yes, this one https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: 12 months ago

• Authenticated Docker Hub image pulls in Kubernetes

  Operate a pull-through cache registry, like Artifactory or the open source reference Docker registry. This will allow you to pull images from Docker Hub less frequently, improving your chances of staying under the anonymous usage limit. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Siberian CMS mentions (0)