DocFX VS Hugo
Compare DocFX VS Hugo and see what are their differences
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks.
featured
DocFX
Doxygen
Docsify.js
Daux.io
Natural Docs
Docusaurus
NDoc
Sandcastle
Hugo
Jekyll
Ghost
WordPress
GatsbyJS
Hexo
Fellow.app
Grav
DocFXBased on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than DocFX. While we know about 354 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 7 mentions of DocFX. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This is a better looking version of what Java and C# have had for a long time (kudos to the author for that!), is that the inspiration for this tool? https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/tools/windows/javadoc.html https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/ I saw the author mentioned in another comment that they found themselves peeping inside type declaration files "too often". While I do often use sites generated... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Actually, we use it for OptiTune, it's called "docfx" https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/. Source: about 2 years ago
We would really prefer to use a somewhat generic pre-made tool for this (such as DocFX) compared to rolling our own solution. We can roll our own solution... But would prefer not to so that we can minimize development and maintenance overhead. Source: over 2 years ago
I use docfx from microsoft to generate documentation for all my oss libraries. Source: over 2 years ago
My best guess would be that there's a CI/CD pipeline in GitHub that utilizes DocFX to convert the Markdown files to HTML. The constructed HTML files are then placed in an Azure Storage account that configured for Static Website Hosting combined with Azure CDN. Source: over 2 years ago
At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Docsify.js - A magical documentation site generator.
Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.
Daux.io - Daux.io is a documentation generator that uses a simple folder structure and Markdown files to...
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.