Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
GHF

DocBook VS GitHub Flavored Markdown

Compare DocBook VS GitHub Flavored Markdown and see what are their differences

BoldDesk
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

DocBook logo DocBook

DocBook is a schema (available in several languages including RELAX NG, SGML and XML DTDs, and W3C...

GitHub Flavored Markdown logo GitHub Flavored Markdown

GitHub uses "GitHub Flavored Markdown," or GFM, across the site--in issues, comments, and...
  • DocBook Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-20
  • GitHub Flavored Markdown Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

DocBook features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

GitHub Flavored Markdown features and specs

  • Widespread Usage
    GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM) is widely used in the GitHub community, making it a popular choice for collaborating on open-source projects and documenting code repositories.
  • Enhanced Features
    GFM extends the standard Markdown with additional features like tables, strikethrough, and syntax highlighting, allowing for more expressive and informative content.
  • Version Control Integration
    GFM is seamlessly integrated with GitHub’s version control system, making it easy to track changes, collaborate on documentation, and propose updates through pull requests.
  • Live Preview
    GitHub provides a live preview of Markdown files, which helps users see how their Markdown will render, ensuring the final document looks as expected.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Since GFM is based on Markdown, documents can be easily shared and rendered across different platforms and services, retaining consistent formatting.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Flavored Markdown

  • Limited Advanced Formatting
    While GFM offers several enhancements over standard Markdown, it still lacks support for some advanced formatting options found in richer text editors or other markup languages.
  • GitHub Dependency
    GFM is primarily designed to work within the GitHub ecosystem, which can limit usefulness outside of GitHub, especially if using features specific to GFM.
  • Learning Curve
    Users familiar with standard Markdown might need to learn the additional syntax and features of GFM, which can be an initial barrier for some.
  • Consistency Issues
    Rendering consistency might vary when GFM documents are viewed outside of GitHub, as some features might not be supported in other Markdown processors.

DocBook videos

+ Add

DocBook Editing Support in Oxygen XML Editor 18.1

More videos:

  • Review - DocBook Profiling in Oxygen XML Editor 12
  • Review - DocBook Documentation at SUSE Automatically Ensuring Quality of SUSE Documentation

GitHub Flavored Markdown videos

+ Add

Demystifying Markdown – Learn GitHub flavored Markdown (GFM) on Skillshare | Clyde D'Souza

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DocBook and GitHub Flavored Markdown)

DocBook

GitHub Flavored Markdown

Documentation As A Service & Tools
51 51%
Documentation As A Service & Tools
49% 49
Documentation
44 44%
Documentation
56% 56
Document Automation
50 50%
Document Automation
50% 50
Knowledge Base
0 0%
Knowledge Base
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using DocBook and GitHub Flavored Markdown. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

GitHub Flavored Markdown might be a bit more popular than DocBook. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to DocBook. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

DocBook mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: LaTeX is great. Has anyone tried to build something better?
    The two that come to mind are ConTeXt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ConTeXt (official: https://contextgarden.net) and DocBook https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook (official: https://docbook.org). There are others, but they're less-serious and often not general purpose. Then there's the entire class of Markdown-based solutions (I personally wouldn't attempt academic work with any of those). The other typesetting... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

GitHub Flavored Markdown mentions (1)

  • Resources for proper putting of code on to GitHub ?
    Not sure quite what you mean. Are you asking "what should I put on GitHub" or "how to make it look pretty?" For the latter, check out https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github. Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DocBook and GitHub Flavored Markdown, you can also consider the following products

Text::Amuse - Markup language for AMuseWiki.

Nots.io - Keep your documentation up-to-date | Nots.io

Caoutchouc - Typesetting language using Markdown and AsciiMath to format documents

Sphinx Documentation Generator - Sphinx is a tool that makes it easy to create intelligent and beautiful documentation, written by...

Groff - The groff (GNU troff) software is a typesetting package which reads plain text mixed with...

GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.

Loading...