Based on our record, JSDoc seems to be a lot more popular than Dkron. While we know about 51 links to JSDoc, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Dkron. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
My SaaS is not that big and doesn't need very complicated CRON management. I tried different options like dkron but it doesn't hold any job data after for example removing the container, according to a discusion issue I created. Source: over 1 year ago
Well, you can either use this as an example or use it cause the work is done: dkron. Source: over 1 year ago
I'am also familiar to hangfire, used in the past as distributed job scheduler for Owin microservices in C# too. Btw when we moved towards Golang stack realized that hangfire wasnt really necessary. It was enough standard and idiomatic Go code, learning using Go Routine adding any Cron library and maybe a Redis dependency if persistence is needed. But if you really prefer something hangfire-like, give a try to... Source: over 2 years ago
Perhaps https://dkron.io/ can solve your problem? Source at https://github.com/distribworks/dkron. Source: over 2 years ago
Oops, my bad. I was trying to refer to dkron https://dkron.io/. Source: over 2 years ago
Thanks to JSDoc it's easy to write documentation that is coupled with your code and can be consumed by users in a variety of formats. When combined with a modern publishing flow like JSR, you can easily create comprehensive documentation for your package that not only fits within your workflow, but also integrates directly in the tools your users consume your package with. This blog post aims to cover best... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Note: For simplicity, I will omit the JavaScript documentation, but for a production grade code you may want to add the documentation (see jsdoc.app website for more). - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
You may like JSDoc[1] if you just want some type-safety from the IDE without the compilation overhead. It’s done wonders when I’ve had to wrangle poorly commented legacy JavaScript codebases where most of the overhead is tracing what type the input parameters are. Personally, I’m impartial to TypeScript or JSDoc at this point. But I’d rather have either over plain JavaScript. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
I wholeheartedly agree. At most, I introduce JSDoc[1] to newer developers as standardising how parameters and whatnot are commented at least gets you better documentation and _some_ safety without adding any TS knowledge overhead. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
The best way to do this, of course, is with JSDoc. But something I always found awkward about jsdoc is defining the object types in the same file. So, after a lot of reading, I found a way to combine JSDoc with declaration type files from Typescript. Let me give you an example:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Apache OpenWhisk - Serverless / Task Processing
Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code
RAML - RAML is a solution that manages an API lifecycle from design to sharing.
Swagger UI - Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swag
Blacklight - Blacklight is a free and open source ruby-on-rails based discovery interface (a.k.a.
JSOLint - Format, verify, and lint JSON effortlessly with our powerful Validator Tool. Generate pretty JSON and validate online for free. Simplify your JSON tasks