DisplayJS VS Unused CSS finder

A simple JavaScript framework for building ambitious UIs 😊

Crawl your website and find unused CSS

Simple Syntax
DisplayJS has a straightforward and easy-to-learn syntax, making it accessible to beginners who are new to JavaScript frameworks.
Data Binding
It offers efficient data binding capabilities that update the UI automatically when the data changes, reducing the need for manual DOM manipulation.
Lightweight
DisplayJS is lightweight, ensuring fast load times and better performance for web applications.
Minimal Dependencies
The library has minimal dependencies, which simplifies integration and reduces potential conflicts with other libraries.

Limited Features
DisplayJS may lack some advanced features and functionalities compared to more established frameworks, which could limit its use in complex applications.
Small Community
The community around DisplayJS is relatively small, resulting in fewer resources for learning and troubleshooting.
Less Mature
As a newer library, DisplayJS may have fewer best practices established and could be prone to bugs and stability issues.
Limited Documentation
The documentation for DisplayJS might not be as comprehensive as that of more popular frameworks, potentially making it harder for developers to fully utilize its features.

Efficiency
Identifies unused CSS, resulting in cleaner and more efficient code. This can lead to improved page load times and reduced bandwidth usage.
Ease of Use
Provides a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly scan their websites and find unnecessary CSS without needing extensive technical knowledge.
Cost Savings
By eliminating unused CSS, it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted and stored, potentially saving on hosting and bandwidth costs.
Improved Maintenance
With a reduction in CSS file size, future maintenance becomes easier and more manageable, making it simpler to update or refactor code.

False Positives
May incorrectly identify CSS as unused if the tool does not recognize dynamic changes or conditional loading, which can lead to accidental removal of necessary styles.
Dependency on External Tool
Relying on an external tool could present privacy and security concerns, especially when sharing potentially sensitive code and styling information.
Manual Verification
Requires manual verification of results to ensure important styles are not removed, which can be time-consuming and somewhat negate the tool's time savings.
Incompatibility with Complex Frameworks
Might not effectively handle complex CSS frameworks or preprocessors, where styles are used indirectly or dynamically through Javascript or server-side frameworks.