Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Discourse VS Qwilr

Compare Discourse VS Qwilr and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Discourse logo Discourse

Discourse is an open source discussion platform built for the next decade of the Internet.

Qwilr logo Qwilr

Turn your quotes, proposals and presentations into interactive and mobile-friendly webpages that...
  • Discourse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13
  • Qwilr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06

Our aim is to make it as easy as possible for businesses to create epic documents that they can use internally, with their clients and share online. Our templates are not only professional & interactive, but are created as an individual web page that allows for easy shareability & data measuring.

Discourse

Website
discourse.org
Pricing URL
Official Discourse Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $100.0 / Monthly
Release Date
-
Edit details

Qwilr

Website
qwilr.com
Pricing URL
Official Qwilr Pricing
$ Details
-
Release Date
2014 January
Startup details
Country
Australia
State
New South Wales
City
Redfern
Founder(s)
Dylan Baskind
Employees
10 - 19
Edit details

Discourse features and specs

  • Modern Interface
    Discourse provides a clean, intuitive, and responsive user interface that works well on both desktops and mobile devices.
  • Open Source
    Discourse is open source software, allowing for customization, self-hosting, and community contributions, which can reduce costs and increase flexibility.
  • Rich Features
    The platform includes a variety of built-in features such as threaded replies, real-time notifications, and community moderation tools.
  • Scalability
    Discourse is designed to handle small communities as well as large, active forums, making it suitable for a variety of use cases.
  • Security
    Regular updates and a dedicated security team help keep the software secure against vulnerabilities.
  • Integration and APIs
    Discourse offers extensive APIs and integrates well with various other services and plugins, facilitating seamless extensions and automation.

Possible disadvantages of Discourse

  • Resource Intensive
    Discourse can be resource-heavy, which may require significant server capacity and maintenance, especially for large communities.
  • Hosting Costs
    While you can self-host Discourse, the server and maintenance costs can be high. Managed hosting plans provided by Discourse can also be expensive.
  • Complex Setup
    Installing and configuring Discourse can be complex, particularly for those without technical expertise in server management and Ruby on Rails.
  • Learning Curve
    Users and administrators might face a steeper learning curve compared to more traditional forum software due to its modern interface and extensive features.
  • Limited Built-in Themes
    The default theme options are somewhat limited, and extensive customization requires knowledge of front-end development.
  • Dependency on PostgreSQL and Redis
    Discourse relies on PostgreSQL for its database and Redis for caching, which might complicate setup and maintenance compared to solutions that use simpler database architectures.

Qwilr features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    Qwilr offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the creation of visually appealing documents without needing extensive design skills.
  • Customization Options
    The platform provides a wide range of customizable templates, allowing users to create tailored proposals, reports, and other business documents.
  • Interactive Content
    Qwilr supports interactive elements like videos, maps, and calendars, enhancing the engagement and readability of documents.
  • Analytics
    The platform includes analytics and tracking capabilities, enabling users to see how recipients interact with their documents.
  • Integrations
    Qwilr integrates with other popular tools such as CRM systems, allowing for seamless workflow integration and automation.

Possible disadvantages of Qwilr

  • Pricing
    Qwilr can be expensive for small businesses or freelancers, as its pricing may not be as competitive as other document creation tools.
  • Learning Curve
    While Qwilr is generally easy to use, new users might experience a learning curve when first getting accustomed to its features and interface.
  • Limited Offline Access
    Qwilr's functionality is primarily online, so users may find it challenging to access or edit documents without an internet connection.
  • Template Restrictions
    Some users may find the available templates somewhat restrictive and not suitable for all types of document needs.
  • Feature Availability
    Certain advanced features and customization options might only be available on higher-tier plans, requiring additional investment.

Discourse videos

+ Add

Why We Chose The Discourse Platform For Our Forums

More videos:

  • Review - Why Discourse is the Best Forum Software Out There (No, Really) | Location Rebel
  • Review - A Grammar Review for Discourse Analysis

Qwilr videos

+ Add

Qwilr Review - Beginners to Expert Guide PREVIEW by Bizversity.com

More videos:

  • Demo - Qwilr Demo Video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Discourse and Qwilr)

Discourse

Qwilr

Forums And Forum Software
100 100%
Forums And Forum Software
0% 0
Document Automation
0 0%
Document Automation
100% 100
Forums
100 100%
Forums
0% 0
Document Management
0 0%
Document Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Discourse and Qwilr. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Discourse and Qwilr

Discourse Reviews

20 Telegram Alternatives to Chat With in 2024
Discourse is a basic forum function that could be an alternative to Telegram if you want to stick to text discussions. It's pretty analog, missing both video and livestreaming tools. Instead, Discourse is a basic community that lets you organize discussions--it feels a bit like having your own reddit or Quora.
Source: www.mightynetworks.com
18 Best Discord Alternatives 2020 | Expert Reviews
Discourse comes in a couple of flavours. You can self-host it yourself in which case the software is free, and you simply need to sign up for server space, or you can pay Discourse for a hosted-for-you option, though self-hosting is a lot cheaper the premium option takes care of the technical side.
Source: solutionsuggest.com
IndieHackers: Best forum software
I used Flarum when trying to get a community set up for my product (ended up abandoning it to revisit when we have a larger customer base). It worked fairly well and I enjoyed it but it's definitely beta and unless you're fairly tech savvy it's not quite worth the setup / maintenance. Lots of config changes, crashes, huge issues with plugins, and some features missing. I'd...
Source: www.indiehackers.com

Qwilr Reviews

10 best PandaDoc alternatives & competitors in 2024
By integrating with customer relationship management (CRM) tools, Qwilr can automate many aspects of sales workflows, including generating sales material and personalizing content. Buyer tracking and reporting lets users see how clients engage with proposals and notifies them when a proposal has been viewed or signed.
Source: www.jotform.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Discourse seems to be a lot more popular than Qwilr. While we know about 23 links to Discourse, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Qwilr. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Discourse mentions (23)

  • Qilin: A Starter Project Template For Every Open Source Project
    GitHub Discussions can also be a great place for support as long as these are regularly monitored. Another option along the same lines is Discourse and the Open Source Matrix which is used by quite a few Open Source and community-based projects. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: How to run an old-school mailing list?
    A lot of communities use [Discourse ](https://discourse.org). [LPSF](https://forum lpsf.org) migrated to it when Yahoo Groups was discontinued. Some of the advantages are that it's open source, self-hostable, and can be configured to work as both a traditional mailing list and modern forum. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • My Fediverse use – I'm hosting everything myself – PeerTube, Mastodon and Lemmy
    More like https://discourse.org/. You can run it yourself, but I can also just have them ding a credit card every month and not think about it again (I do this for a community). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Reddit faces content quality concerns after its Great Mod Purge
    Discourse perhaps? I've seen it in use in a few places; it has a modern look and feel to it at least. https://discourse.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • So Long, Twitter and Reddit
    I fully agree with you see my comment here[0] -- I think you may have misread my comment, it says "Discourse" (as in the forum software[1]), not Discord. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37245220. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

Qwilr mentions (2)

  • Tell me about your product and I’ll tell you how to market it
    Can you tell me more about it? Is it any different from https://qwilr.com or pandadoc.com or is a direct competitor to those. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Software Recommendations for RFPs & Quotes?
    When we initially researched, we did them independently. For RFP software, we wanted something to help with tracking, analyzing, generating proposals, AI answer suggestion/knowledge base, assigning related tasks etc. Avnio & RFPIO made our shortlist. For Quote software, we wanted something shiny, to make closing faster and easier to understand. Qwilr and PandaDocs were rated pretty high. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Discourse and Qwilr, you can also consider the following products

Flarum - Flarum is the next-generation forum software that makes online discussion fun. It's simple, fast, and free.

PandaDoc - Boost your revenue with PandaDoc. A document automation tool that delivers higher close rates and shorter sales cycles. We've helped over 30,000+ companies.

phpBB - Raspberry Pi. The Raspberry Pi is a cheap, credit-card sized computer. The official website uses phpBB for their discussion forums. phpBB is not affiliated with nor responsible for any of the sites listed on the showcase.

Proposify - A simpler way to deliver winning proposals to clients.

Vanilla Forums - Build an engaging community forum using Vanilla's modern cloud forum software.

Conga Contracts - Conga Contracts is management solution designed to accelerate and simplify contract negotiations in Salesforce.

Loading...