Software Alternatives & Reviews

Disciple VS Coq

Compare Disciple VS Coq and see what are their differences

Disciple logo Disciple

Grow, engage and monetise your community with Disciple community software. Get your own branded community platform on Web, iOS and Android

Coq logo Coq

Coq is a proof assistant, which allows you to write mathematical proofs in a rigorous and formal...
  • Disciple Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-30

We help companies build independent, valuable and trusted communities in a safe space that they own and control. With Disciple community platform, you can create unlimited groups to segment your audience, post content and videos, Livestream, sell online courses and subscriptions and use analytics to understand your community better. Your members can create their own profiles and then use that information to find, friend and message each other. Get your own community platform on Web, iOS and Android.

  • Coq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17

Disciple

$ Details
paid Free Trial £299.0 / Monthly
Platforms
iOS Android Browser PWA
Release Date
2018 March

Coq

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Disciple videos

Disciple's Product Demo

Coq videos

Ubiquinol CoQ-10 Supplement Review

More videos:

  • Review - Gumbenni listened to Sseth's review on Coq

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Disciple and Coq)
Community Platform
100 100%
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Communication
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Disciple and Coq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Coq seems to be a lot more popular than Disciple. While we know about 46 links to Coq, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Disciple. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Disciple mentions (2)

  • DiscipleMedia.com is complicit in organizing the North Idaho Beartaria cult compound
    As we've all seen from the latest news, there's a cult compound being built in North Idaho known as "Beartaria". Currently cult members are organizing using the Beartaria Times App using the DiscipleMedia.com community platform. It's important we inform this company of the current news that's going on, and that what their platform is being used for. I don't think they want to be associated with an alleged... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • sent to me by anon.
    The beartaria times app required no development/build from anyone in the bear community. They simply pay for existing tools/infrastructure. Similar to the uatv/vimeo debacle, beartaria times is simply an "app" running on the disciple media platform - disciplemedia.com. Anyone can confirm this themselves by visiting the beartaria app in a browser and viewing the html. Per disciplemedia's own documentation, even... Source: almost 3 years ago

Coq mentions (46)

  • The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation
    Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong
    Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?
    Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago
  • Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8
    Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: 12 months ago
  • Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs
    This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Disciple and Coq, you can also consider the following products

Mighty Networks - Mighty Networks enables entrepreneurs, organizations, and companies to create and grow a community-powered brand.

Agda - Agda is a dependently typed functional programming language. It has inductive families, i.e.

ForumFree - ForumFree allows you to create a forum or a blog in a few simple steps.

Isabelle - Isabelle is a proof assistant for writing and checking mathematical proofs by computer.

Proboards - ProBoards is a host of free forums with customer service.

Idris - Programming, Programming Language, Learning Resources, Languages, and Frontend Development