Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Digger VS GitlabRunner

Compare Digger VS GitlabRunner and see what are their differences

Digger logo Digger

Build on AWS without having to learn it, no-code DevOps

GitlabRunner logo GitlabRunner

Speed up your CI/CD pipeline
  • Digger Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14
  • GitlabRunner Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-03-10

Digger features and specs

  • Infrastructure as Code
    Digger provides the ability to define infrastructure using code, which allows for versioning, automated testing, and consistency in deployment.
  • Scalability
    With Digger, you can easily scale your infrastructure up or down based on your needs, which helps in efficient resource management.
  • Automation
    Digger enables automation of infrastructure deployment, reducing manual intervention and the possibility of human errors.
  • Cross-Cloud Compatibility
    The tool supports multiple cloud providers, making it easier to manage a multi-cloud environment.
  • Community Support
    Active community support can provide quick resolutions to common issues and facilitate sharing of best practices.

Possible disadvantages of Digger

  • Learning Curve
    New users may find it challenging to learn and effectively use Digger unless they have prior experience with Infrastructure as Code paradigms.
  • Potential Complexity
    For smaller projects, using a comprehensive tool like Digger might add unnecessary complexity.
  • Dependence on Cloud Providers
    Although Digger supports multiple cloud providers, users are still dependent on their API availability and potential downtime.
  • Resource Costs
    Automating infrastructure can sometimes lead to unintentional over-provisioning, resulting in higher cloud costs.
  • Security Concerns
    Infrastructure as Code tools need appropriate security measures to ensure that sensitive information is not exposed.

GitlabRunner features and specs

  • Integration with GitLab
    GitLab Runner integrates seamlessly with GitLab CI/CD, providing a smooth experience for managing and deploying builds directly from your repositories.
  • Multiple Executor Types
    GitLab Runner supports various executors like Docker, Shell, VirtualBox, Parallels, SSH, and Kubernetes, allowing flexibility in running builds in different environments.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GitLab Runner allows for complete transparency, the ability to customize or extend functionalities, and does not incur licensing costs.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    GitLab Runner can be installed on multiple platforms, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, offering versatility in build server setup.
  • Autoscaling
    With native support for autoscaling on cloud platforms, GitLab Runner can scale resources up or down, optimizing cost and performance based on demand.

Possible disadvantages of GitlabRunner

  • Complex Setup for Large Projects
    Configuring GitLab Runner for large and complex projects can be challenging, often requiring significant DevOps expertise to optimize the pipeline and runners efficiently.
  • Resource Management
    Managing resources effectively can be complex, especially when dealing with shared runners, which might lead to resource contention or inefficient builds.
  • Limited Community Support
    While GitLab Runner is open source, its community and third-party support might not be as extensive as other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Lack of Plugins
    Compared to other CI/CD systems, GitLab Runner has fewer third-party plugins, which might require custom scripts or workarounds to achieve specific functionalities.
  • Dependency on GitLab
    The tight integration means that GitLab Runner is heavily reliant on GitLab, limiting its use in environments where GitLab is not the primary version control system.

Digger videos

Game Review - Digger 1983 (Full)

More videos:

  • Review - Classic Game Room HD - DIGGER for Playstation 3 review
  • Review - Bobcat E19 Mini Digger Review

GitlabRunner videos

No GitlabRunner videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Digger and GitlabRunner)
Productivity
91 91%
9% 9
Developer Tools
81 81%
19% 19
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Software Engineering
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Digger and GitlabRunner. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Digger seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Digger mentions (12)

  • OpenTofu 1.7.0 is out with State Encryption, Dynamic Provider-defined Functions
    None of these are a replacement of Terraform Cloud (recently rebranded to HCP Terraform). For example, when you create a PR, it could affect multiple workspaces. The new experimental version of TFC/TFE (I refuse to call it HCP!) implements Stacks, which is something like a workflow, and links one workspace output to other workspace inputs. None of the open-source solutions, including the paid Digger [0], support... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Call for a new public facing “validation metric” for Commercial OSS startups
    I'm part of the founding team at Digger, an Open Source Terraform Enterprise alternative. For the past few days, I have been wanting to talk about why the usual metrics in Commercial Open Source just don't cut it anymore. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • publish terraform file to build artifacts in CI?
    Depending on the organisation, it is not always a good idea to make assumptions on what another team will be doing to use your module. Don't get me wrong, there are attempts at making cross-platform workflows like digger.dev, or RedHat who have recently released an ansible playbook that runs terraform (so in theory you'd only need ansible then) but at the very minimum, be aware if you tightly integrate your... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Want to start an OSS bounty program - how do we structure it?
    We are building an open source terraform cloud alternative (https://digger.dev/) and are looking to start a bounty program. Source: about 2 years ago
  • 7 websites a developer should definitely check to change their life (trust me):
    Digger Low code tool that can generate infrastructure for your code in your AWS account. So you can build on AWS without having to learn it. 🔗 http://digger.dev. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

GitlabRunner mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GitlabRunner yet. Tracking of GitlabRunner recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Digger and GitlabRunner, you can also consider the following products

RevOps - Building blocks for better sales agreements

Buddy - The simplest CI/CD tool ever made, acclaimed by top developers worldwide. It uses delivery pipelines to build, test and deploy software. Pipelines are created with over 100 ready-to-use actions, that can be arranged in any way.

DevStream - DevStream is an open source DevOps toolchain manager, empowering you to set up flexible DevOps toolchains in 5 minutes with 1 command.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Render UIKit - React-inspired Swift library for writing UIKit UIs

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.