Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Diff So Fancy VS Kitty terminal

Compare Diff So Fancy VS Kitty terminal and see what are their differences

Diff So Fancy logo Diff So Fancy

Make Git diffs look good

Kitty terminal logo Kitty terminal

Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support
  • Diff So Fancy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22
  • Kitty terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-21

Diff So Fancy features and specs

  • Improved Readability
    Diff So Fancy enhances the readability of diffs by highlighting changes in a more visually appealing manner, making it easier to understand code differences quickly.
  • Enhanced Formatting
    It offers better formatting for diffs, such as aligning text and adding colors to improve the clarity of additions and deletions, which helps developers focus on significant changes.
  • Customization
    Allows for customization of the git diff output, letting users tailor aspects like colors and formatting styles to fit their needs and preferences.
  • Improved Context
    Provides better context around changes by emphasizing the specific portions of lines that were altered, reducing the mental effort required to parse diffs.

Possible disadvantages of Diff So Fancy

  • Dependency on Git
    Diff So Fancy is a tool that works in conjunction with git, meaning its usefulness is limited to environments where git is utilized.
  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    The initial setup and configuration may be complex for beginners or those unfamiliar with command-line tools, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Overhead
    Applying additional formatting and enhancements may introduce slight performance overhead in viewing diffs, especially in large repositories or with extensive changes.
  • Limited to Terminal
    Primarily designed for use in terminal environments, potentially excluding those who rely on GUI-based tools for version control management.

Kitty terminal features and specs

  • Performance
    Kitty is designed to be a fast and efficient terminal, with support for GPU rendering. This can provide smoother and quicker display updates, especially beneficial for intensive command-line tasks.
  • Features
    Kitty offers a rich set of features including support for tabs, multiple layouts, and extensions. It also supports features like ligatures, image display, and sixel graphics.
  • Customization
    Kitty is highly customizable, allowing users to modify key bindings, color schemes, and more through its comprehensive configuration files.
  • Remote Control
    Kitty provides a remote control framework, which allows users to script and control the terminal from the command line or other external programs.
  • Platform Support
    Kitty is available on multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows (through WSL), making it versatile for various operating systems.
  • Active Development
    The terminal is actively maintained by its developers, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and the addition of new features.

Possible disadvantages of Kitty terminal

  • Learning Curve
    Given its extensive feature set and customization options, there can be a steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with its configuration and advanced features.
  • Configuration Complexity
    The extensive customization options, while powerful, can be overwhelming and may require a considerable amount of time to configure to a user's liking.
  • Font Support
    Although Kitty supports font ligatures and several other advanced font features, some users have reported occasional issues with font rendering and compatibility.
  • Resource Usage
    While designed for performance, the use of GPU rendering can mean higher resource usage compared to simpler terminals, which might be noticeable on older hardware.
  • Documentation
    Though extensive, the documentation can sometimes be challenging to navigate for new users, making it harder to find specific information or solutions to particular problems.
  • No Native Windows Support
    Kitty does not have native Windows support; it runs on Windows through the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). This might not be ideal for users looking for a fully native Windows terminal experience.

Analysis of Kitty terminal

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Kitty is a highly regarded terminal emulator that is considered good by many users.

Why this product is good

  • Kitty is fast, feature-rich, and supports GPU rendering, which can improve performance. It is highly customizable, supports modern terminal features, and has a friendly and active community. Additionally, it supports features like tabs, layouts, and window management, which many users find convenient.

Recommended for

  • Users who require a fast and efficient terminal emulator.
  • Those who need advanced features and customization options.
  • Developers who appreciate GPU acceleration for rendering.
  • Anyone looking for a terminal emulator with active community support.

Diff So Fancy videos

No Diff So Fancy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Kitty terminal videos

Kitty Is A Fast And Feature Rich Terminal Emulator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Diff So Fancy and Kitty terminal)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
SSH
0 0%
100% 100
Development
52 52%
48% 48
Terminal Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Diff So Fancy and Kitty terminal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kitty terminal should be more popular than Diff So Fancy. It has been mentiond 93 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Diff So Fancy mentions (17)

  • Core Git Developers Configure Git
    https://github.com/so-fancy/diff-so-fancy
        [alias].
    - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Difftastic, a structural diff tool that understands syntax
    The diff itself is impressive, but in terms of styling I still prefer diff-so-fancy[1]. It's easier to read at a glance. [1]: https://github.com/so-fancy/diff-so-fancy/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Git Learnt
    This is actually one that's really easy to write and remember but I hate typing and I run it all the time, so I've aliased it down to gd for git-diff. Also I use diff-so-fancy to make the output of my diffs look frickin sweet and I suggest you do the same. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • diff: can I increase highlighting of a file name?
    I recommend a tool like diff-so-fancy with some custom colors. You will never want to go back to vanilla diffs. Source: over 2 years ago
  • diff: can I increase highlighting of a file name?
    Ok, thanks, diff-so-fancy is a good solution for me. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Kitty terminal mentions (93)

  • Optimizing My Dev Workflow in 2025
    Initially, I used the Mac's built-in Terminal, but encountered issues with font loading. This led me to explore alternative terminal options. I initially chose Kitty, but after the official release of Ghostty, I made the switch. It has been running flawlessly for me. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • iTerm2 Critical Security Fix
    Kitty (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty) has been my go to for many years and with tmux it's fantastic. I have heard a lot of great things about https://ghostty.org/ but haven't had a chance to check it out. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Preview images, videos, fonts, PDFs ... in Vifm.
    The terminal I am currently using is st but I have also tested this "Vifm" enhancement in kitty and alacritty. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: Shpool, a Lightweight Tmux Alternative
    Oh, this might be the missing piece of the puzzle for me to get rid of tmux! I've been using screen/tmux for a long time. Recently I switched to kitty[0] locally. I like kitty a lot! But I've been stuck with tmux on my servers for session persistence. [0]: https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Ask HN: What macOS apps/programs do you use daily and recommend?
    Besides the usual Firefox/Chrome, Spotify, etc I use the following: - Karabiner-Elements for key remapping, specifically, for making caps lock into ctrl/esc. I don't know of anything else that does this job. Everyone who remaps keys seems to use this. - Kitty as my terminal of choice. I spend most of my time logged in remotely to a server via ssh where I attach to a tmux session. Kitty was easy enough to... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Diff So Fancy and Kitty terminal, you can also consider the following products

WPMU DEV - WPMU offers WordPress Plugins, WordPress Themes, WordPress Multisite and BuddyPress Plugins and Themes.

wezterm - GPU-accelerated cross-platform terminal emulator and multiplexer made with Rust.

MAMP - MAMP is the abbreviation for Macintosh, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. It is a reliable application with its four components that allows you to access the local PHP server as well as the database server (SQL).

iTerm2 - A terminal emulator for macOS that does amazing things.

Firefox Developer Edition - Built for those who build the Web. The only browser made for developers.

Tabby.sh - Tabby is a free and open source SSH, local and Telnet terminal with everything you'll ever need.