Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

DesignRevision VS Three.js

Compare DesignRevision VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

DesignRevision logo DesignRevision

Powerful tools for web professionals

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
Not present
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

DesignRevision features and specs

  • Rich UI Components
    DesignRevision offers a wide variety of UI components, including buttons, forms, tables, and cards, which can save developers considerable time and effort in designing and implementing their UI.
  • Pre-built Templates
    The platform provides a selection of pre-built templates that can be easily customized. This helps in quickly prototyping or developing applications, especially useful for beginners or time-constrained projects.
  • Documentation
    Extensive documentation is available, which helps in understanding how to use various components, templates, and overall design principles. This is useful for both novices and experienced developers.
  • Customization Options
    The components and templates are highly customizable to fit the specific needs and branding requirements of a project. This flexibility enhances the utility of DesignRevision for a variety of projects.
  • Bootstrap-Compatible
    DesignRevision's components are compatible with Bootstrap, one of the most popular CSS frameworks. This ensures easy integration with existing projects that already use Bootstrap.

Possible disadvantages of DesignRevision

  • Cost
    While some resources on DesignRevision are free, full access to all templates and components comes at a cost. This could be a barrier for hobbyists, small businesses, or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite the extensive documentation, there is still a learning curve involved in understanding and integrating the components effectively into projects, especially for those new to front-end development.
  • Limited Niche Components
    While the platform offers a wide range of general UI components, it may lack niche or specialized components that are sometimes required for specific business needs.
  • Dependency on Bootstrap
    Though compatibility with Bootstrap is generally a pro, it can also be a con for developers who prefer or are required to use a different framework, as this limits flexibility.
  • Performance Overhead
    Using a vast number of modular components can sometimes lead to performance overhead, especially in larger applications. This requires careful planning and optimization.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Analysis of DesignRevision

Overall verdict

  • Yes, DesignRevision is generally considered a good resource for design professionals and enthusiasts. It offers functional and aesthetically pleasing UI kits that can significantly aid in web design projects.

Why this product is good

  • DesignRevision is well-regarded for offering high-quality design resources and UI kits that are versatile and easy to use. Their products are known for being responsive and customizable, catering to the needs of both novice and experienced designers. The site also provides comprehensive documentation and support, making it a reliable choice for users looking to streamline their design process.

Recommended for

    DesignRevision is recommended for web designers, UI/UX developers, and startups looking for cost-effective and time-efficient design resources. It is particularly beneficial for those who need ready-made, high-quality design components that can be easily integrated into various projects.

DesignRevision videos

No DesignRevision videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DesignRevision and Three.js)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using DesignRevision and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare DesignRevision and Three.js

DesignRevision Reviews

We have no reviews of DesignRevision yet.
Be the first one to post

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 248 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

DesignRevision mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of DesignRevision yet. Tracking of DesignRevision recommendations started around Nov 2022.

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DesignRevision and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Mockuuups Studio - Fast and easy way to create product mockups on macOS, Windows and Linux.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

lstore.graphic - Mockup Scene Creator

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Flatlogic - AI-Powered Software Development for Startups and Businesses

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.