Darkmode Widget VS Unused CSS finder

Add a dark-mode to your website in a few seconds 🌓

Crawl your website and find unused CSS

Reduced Eye Strain
Dark mode can minimize eye strain for users, especially in low-light environments, by reducing the amount of light emitted by the screen.
Battery Saving
On OLED screens, dark mode can help save battery life as less power is used to illuminate dark pixels.
Aesthetically Pleasing
Dark mode can offer a sleek and modern look, which some users find more appealing than traditional light themes.
Enhanced Focus
Some users find that dark mode helps them focus better on content by reducing glare and distractions.

Readability Issues
Dark mode can sometimes make reading difficult, especially for long periods, as black text on a white background is traditionally easier to read.
Visibility in Bright Environments
Dark mode can be hard to see in bright or direct sunlight, as the lower contrast makes screen content less visible.
Inconsistent Implementation
Across different apps and platforms, dark mode might not be consistently implemented, leading to a fragmented user experience.
Color Perception
For tasks that rely on accurate color perception, such as graphic design, dark mode might distort colors and affect usability.

Efficiency
Identifies unused CSS, resulting in cleaner and more efficient code. This can lead to improved page load times and reduced bandwidth usage.
Ease of Use
Provides a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly scan their websites and find unnecessary CSS without needing extensive technical knowledge.
Cost Savings
By eliminating unused CSS, it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted and stored, potentially saving on hosting and bandwidth costs.
Improved Maintenance
With a reduction in CSS file size, future maintenance becomes easier and more manageable, making it simpler to update or refactor code.

False Positives
May incorrectly identify CSS as unused if the tool does not recognize dynamic changes or conditional loading, which can lead to accidental removal of necessary styles.
Dependency on External Tool
Relying on an external tool could present privacy and security concerns, especially when sharing potentially sensitive code and styling information.
Manual Verification
Requires manual verification of results to ensure important styles are not removed, which can be time-consuming and somewhat negate the tool's time savings.
Incompatibility with Complex Frameworks
Might not effectively handle complex CSS frameworks or preprocessors, where styles are used indirectly or dynamically through Javascript or server-side frameworks.