Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Dapr VS Amazon SQS

Compare Dapr VS Amazon SQS and see what are their differences

Dapr logo Dapr

Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Microservices Tools

Amazon SQS logo Amazon SQS

Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.
  • Dapr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-22
  • Amazon SQS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-22

Dapr features and specs

  • Platform Agnostic
    Dapr is platform agnostic, which means it can run on any cloud or on-premise environment, allowing developers to build applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Language Neutral
    Developers can build applications using any programming language that supports HTTP/gRPC, providing flexibility in choosing technologies that match their expertise or the project's requirements.
  • Microservices Ready
    Dapr is designed to support the microservices architecture, providing building blocks like service invocation, state management, and publish/subscribe messaging, which simplify managing microservices at scale.
  • Extensible
    Dapr supports extensible components and can be easily integrated with multiple services and custom extensions, enhancing functionality and adaptability in various environments and use cases.
  • Built-in Best Practices
    Dapr encapsulates best practices for cloud-native application development, enabling developers to focus more on business logic than infrastructure concerns.

Possible disadvantages of Dapr

  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to distributed systems or Dapr, there can be a significant learning curve to understand how to effectively use Dapr’s features and deploy it in production environments.
  • Dependency on External System
    Using Dapr introduces an additional dependency, which means applications are tightly coupled with the Dapr runtime. This can add complexity to debugging and require consideration during system upgrades and maintenance.
  • Performance Overhead
    Because Dapr abstracts many aspects of application development, it can introduce performance overhead, particularly in high-performance applications where every microsecond counts.
  • Community and Ecosystem Maturity
    As a relatively young project, Dapr’s community and ecosystem might not be as mature or extensive as other established frameworks, which could lead to limited support resources or third-party integrations.
  • Operational Complexity
    Deploying and managing multiple Dapr services could lead to increased operational complexity, requiring dedicated effort in DevOps setup and automated monitoring and logging.

Amazon SQS features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon SQS scales automatically to handle an unlimited number of messages, ensuring that your application can support any level of demand without manual intervention.
  • Reliability
    Amazon SQS offers guaranteed delivery of messages, with multiple copies of each message stored redundantly across multiple servers and data centers.
  • Flexibility
    SQS supports both standard and FIFO (First In, First Out) queues, giving you the option to choose the type of queue that best suits your application's requirements.
  • Ease of Use
    Amazon SQS is fully managed, meaning you don't need to worry about provisioning or managing infrastructure. Integration is straightforward with a well-documented API.
  • Cost-Effective
    SQS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the number of calls made to the API and the amount of data transferred, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
  • Security
    SQS integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to control access. Additionally, it supports encryption of messages in transit and at rest, enhancing security.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon SQS

  • Message Limitation
    Each SQS message can body can be up to 256 KB in size during one API call, which might be restrictive for certain applications that require larger message payloads.
  • Latency
    Though generally fast, there can be latency in message delivery, especially when compared to more direct communication methods like WebSocket or gRPC.
  • Complexity in Handling Large Number of Messages
    While SQS can handle a large number of messages, managing a very high throughput can become complex, requiring careful configuration of multiple queues, message batching, and appropriate back-off and retry logic.
  • Cost for High Volume
    While cost-effective for many scenarios, SQS costs can increase significantly with very high volumes of messages due to the per-request pricing, potentially necessitating budget management.
  • Limited Ordering Guarantees
    Standard queues do not ensure the order of message processing. While FIFO queues provide ordering, they come with limitations in terms of throughput and additional costs.
  • Visibility Timeout
    Incorrectly setting the visibility timeout can result in duplicated message processing or delayed message processing, requiring careful consideration and configuration based on the application's characteristics.

Analysis of Amazon SQS

Overall verdict

  • Amazon SQS is a robust and versatile messaging service that is well-suited for a wide range of use cases. Its scalability, reliability, and tight integration with other AWS services make it a strong choice for both small and large applications.

Why this product is good

  • Ease of use
    With integration into the AWS ecosystem, SQS is easy to set up, manage, and integrate with other AWS services.
  • Flexibility
    SQS supports both standard queues and FIFO queues, which cater to different use cases depending on whether message order is important.
  • Reliability
    It provides guaranteed message delivery due to its redundant, distributed architecture.
  • Scalability
    Amazon SQS is highly scalable, allowing businesses to handle a large number of messages as their workload increases.
  • Cost effectiveness
    It offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes.

Recommended for

    {"businesses" => "Businesses of any size looking for an efficient and cost-effective message queuing service.", "developers" => "Developers who need scalable and reliable messaging without managing underlying infrastructure.", "applications" => "Applications requiring asynchronous processing or decoupled architecture."}

Dapr videos

Dapr. Hair Pomade - Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Outstanding Indian Hair Products Episode 2 - DAPR | GIVEAWAY
  • Review - REVIEW OF DAPR HAIR POMADE || UNBOXING DAPR || USING DAPR HAIR POMADE | WOW FRAGRANCE | MISTER BAGGA

Amazon SQS videos

Speed and Reliability at Any Scale: Amazon SQS and Database Services (SVC206) | AWS re:Invent 2013

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Dapr and Amazon SQS)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
16 16%
84% 84
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
18 18%
82% 82

User comments

Share your experience with using Dapr and Amazon SQS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Dapr and Amazon SQS

Dapr Reviews

We have no reviews of Dapr yet.
Be the first one to post

Amazon SQS Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Amazon SQS offers standard features such as dead-letter queues and costs allocation tags. With Amazon SQS, you can access the web services API in any programming language that supports the AWS SDK.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Amazon SQS (Simple Queue Service) is a fully managed, message queuing service for distributed systems, serverless applications, and microservices. It is known for the dissociation of components and the creation of effective asynchronous processes. It possesses a good SKD and a useful console. Because of its salient features, it is easy to use and hence favored by developers.

Social recommendations and mentions

Amazon SQS might be a bit more popular than Dapr. We know about 72 links to it since March 2021 and only 51 links to Dapr. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Dapr mentions (51)

  • Building immutable collection dynamically in Kotlin
    We decided to use Azure Container Apps as a managed Kubernetes platform because it offers everything we need for our project, with acceptable limitations. During the process, we realised that Microsoft includes managed Dapr as part of the service—and we decided to use it. Why? I explain below—and I still don't regret it. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
  • Speed Up Microservices Development with Dapr on AWS EK
    In this blog, we will explore how the open-source Dapr (Distributed Application Runtime) can assist us in building reliable and secure distributed applications. Dapr provides a set of building blocks for common microservice patterns, such as service invocation (calling services), state management (handling data), and pub/sub messaging (publish/subscribe communication), which can significantly reduce the... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Dapr in the cloud with Catalyst public beta
    I've been playing with this thing recently called Dapr (you can blame @marcduiker for me finding out about the project). - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Microservices Architecture Using Azure Container APPS & DAPR & KEDA
    In the demo application architecture deployed into Azure Container Apps, we leverage Dapr for its distributed application runtime capabilities. Before diving into Dapr, let's refresh one of the design patterns called the Sidecar pattern, as Dapr is deployed as a sidecar. For more details, you can visit the Dapr website. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Scaling Sidecars to Zero in Kubernetes
    The sidecar pattern in Kubernetes describes a single pod containing a container in which a main app sits. A helper container (the sidecar) is deployed alongside a main app container within the same pod. This pattern allows each container to focus on a single aspect of the overall functionality, improving the maintainability and scalability of apps deployed in Kubernetes environments. From gathering metrics to... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
View more

Amazon SQS mentions (72)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Dapr and Amazon SQS, you can also consider the following products

Akka - Build powerful reactive, concurrent, and distributed applications in Java and Scala

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Amazon SNS - Fully managed pub/sub messaging for microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications

MassTransit - A free, open-source distributed application framework for .NET.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service