Dapper

Website

learndapper.com

$ Details

-

Categories

#Development #Web Frameworks #Application And Data #Databases #C#

GraphQL

Website

graphql.org

$ Details

Categories

#JavaScript Framework #Developer Tools #Web Frameworks #Javascript UI Libraries

Dapper features and specs

• Performance
  Dapper is known for its high performance as it uses raw SQL queries and maps results directly to objects, which reduces the overhead of ORM frameworks.
• Lightweight
  It is a micro ORM and thus does not add significant weight to the application. It only requires a single DLL, which is simple to integrate.
• Flexibility
  Dapper provides the flexibility to write complex queries and take full advantage of SQL features, performing tasks that are cumbersome with full ORMs.
• Easy Mapping
  Allows easy mapping of data from the database to C# objects, helping developers handle the conversion between the two seamlessly.
• Open Source and Support
  Dapper is open-source and has a strong community support with regular updates and a wealth of resources available for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Dapper

• Lack of Built-in Features
  As a micro ORM, Dapper lacks some of the advanced features present in full-featured ORMs like Entity Framework, such as change tracking and full LINQ support.
• Manual SQL Queries
  Developers need to write SQL queries manually, which can increase the risk of SQL injection and bugs if not handled carefully.
• No Automatic Migration
  Unlike some ORMs, Dapper does not offer automatic database migration capabilities, requiring developers to handle schema changes separately.
• Limited Database Support
  While Dapper supports many popular databases, it may not support niche databases or specific features that are easily managed by other ORMs.

GraphQL features and specs

• Efficient Data Retrieval
  GraphQL allows clients to request only the data they need, reducing the amount of data transferred over the network and improving performance.
• Strongly Typed Schema
  GraphQL uses a strongly typed schema to define the capabilities of an API, providing clear and explicit API contracts and enabling better tooling support.
• Single Endpoint
  GraphQL operates through a single endpoint, unlike REST APIs which require multiple endpoints. This simplifies the server architecture and makes it easier to manage.
• Introspection
  GraphQL allows clients to query the schema for details about the available types and operations, which facilitates the development of powerful developer tools and IDE integrations.
• Declarative Data Fetching
  Clients can specify the shape of the response data declaratively, which enhances flexibility and ensures that the client and server logic are decoupled.
• Versionless
  Because clients specify exactly what data they need, there is no need to create different versions of an API when making changes. This helps in maintaining backward compatibility.
• Increased Responsiveness
  GraphQL can batch multiple requests into a single query, reducing the latency and improving the responsiveness of applications.

Possible disadvantages of GraphQL

• Complexity
  The setup and maintenance of a GraphQL server can be complex. Developers need to define the schema precisely and handle resolvers, which can be more complicated than designing REST endpoints.
• Over-fetching Risk
  Though designed to mitigate over-fetching, poorly designed GraphQL queries can lead to the server needing to fetch more data than necessary, causing performance issues.
• Caching Challenges
  Caching in GraphQL is more challenging than in REST, since different queries can change the shape and size of the response data, making traditional caching mechanisms less effective.
• Learning Curve
  GraphQL has a steeper learning curve compared to RESTful APIs because it introduces new concepts such as schemas, types, and resolvers which developers need to understand thoroughly.
• Complex Rate Limiting
  Implementing rate limiting is more complex with GraphQL than with REST. Since a single query can potentially request a large amount of data, simple per-endpoint rate limiting strategies are not effective.
• Security Risks
  GraphQL's flexibility can introduce security risks. For example, improperly managed schemas could expose sensitive information, and complex queries can lead to denial-of-service attacks.
• Overhead on Small Applications
  For smaller applications with simpler use cases, the overhead introduced by setting up and maintaining a GraphQL server may not be justified compared to a straightforward REST API.

DAPPER FRAGRANCES REVIEW... NOT SPONSORED!

More videos:

REST vs. GraphQL: Critical Look

More videos: