Dangerzone VS TinyJPG

Start here: https://github.com/freedomofpress/dangerzone I've never used it, but I've been meaning to check it out. At least it should give you a jumping off point for further investigation. If that is insufficient, use proofpoint. For archives that are tickling bugs, you have to use a similar technique. it's not enough to analyze them and send them on... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

I've read about the concept of "trusted PDFs" [1] from Qubes OS and the Dangerzone project [2]. I noticed people saying they use such tools to open applicant attachments in the context of employee hiring processes. Isn't it simpler to just open these untrusted files in a cloud service like Google Drive or Microsoft Office online? [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

You can use something similar on macOS, Windows or Linux, based on Docker containers, see Dangerzone: https://github.com/freedomofpress/dangerzone. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

Https://github.com/freedomofpress/dangerzone has been a great tool to use as an added layer of defense. Definitely check out this users other projects as you can tell by the users name that they are made for journalists. Source: about 1 year ago

This is exactly what DangerZone is built for. Takes ‘dangerous’ PDFs, converts them to images and back (via OCR) so there’s nothing potentially harmful inside. Does all the conversion inside docker containers so there’s little chance of a sandbox escape or network access. Source: about 1 year ago

Improve your website speed and mobile responsiveness. Google loves websites that load fast. Make sure your pictures aren't heavy. Use apps like TinyJPG. Use the right amount of animation because too much of anything is bad. Source: 7 months ago

Extract the scanned image and resize to make it a bit smaller, then compress the images on tinyjpg.com, merge them all into one pdf file using smallpdf, finally compress the pdf file again on the same website. Source: about 1 year ago

I'd say that a proper OR recommended approach towards optimizing images for the web is to manually compress them with compression tools like TinyJPG or Squoosh before uploading them to your favorite image CDN. Why? you'd ask me. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Oh and for the file size: compressing is usually better than resizing. And your image is a PNG which is much bigger in size than a JPG and you barely notice the difference. You can use https://tinyjpg.com/ or any proper image editor for good compression or even in Wonderdraft, you can (for sharing on Reddit) better export it as a JPG and at 80% or so. Source: over 1 year ago

Compress image using commandline tool (convert / jpegoptim) or online tool - https://tinyjpg.com/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago