DaisyUI Reviews

ASP.NET Reviews

DaisyUI mentions (138)

• Styling your Dart Jaspr website with Tailwind CSS and DaisyUI

  Luckily, we have DaisyUI, a component library built on top of Tailwind CSS, providing ready-made components and a variety of themes. It significantly simplifies the process of creating beautiful UI elements. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago

• HTML-first, framework-agnostic implementation of shadcn/UI – franken/UI

  DaisyUI offers zero-JS components https://daisyui.com/ I used it for a small form + search result list recently and it works well enough for simple / static stuff. But I think I'll still be reaching for a JS lib first since I'd miss things like inputs-with-autocomplete too much. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• How to use Tailwind with any CSS framework

  Tailwind is great, but creating everything from scratch is annoying. A nice base of components which can be extended with tailwind would be great. There are a few tailwind frameworks like Flowbite, Daisy Ui, but I like Bulma, PicoCSS and Bootstrap. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Building a Fast, Efficient Web App: The Technology Stack of PromptSmithy Explained

  While I have experience with Tailwind and frontend development, I don’t really have the patience to use it. I usually end up using something like Mantine, which is a complete component library UI kit, or Daisy UI, which is a component library built on top of Tailwind. Shadcn/ui is quite similar to Daisy in this sense, but being able to customize the individual components, since they get installed to your... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0

  Https://daisyui.com is a really great middle ground—you can move as fast as you would in Bulma, then drop down into the weeds with TW if you need it. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

ASP.NET mentions (19)

• What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release

  The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?

  Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: over 1 year ago

• Mixing GCloud and F#

  Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Professional transition from Java to C#?

  I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago

• Mudblazor for Blazor

  .NET has had various templating frameworks since its inception in the early 2000's. From the likes of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Forms(WF), ASP.NET Core MVC, Razor Pages to Blazor and now .NET MAUI. Microsoft offers a way to choose an ASP.NET Core web UI for developers to find the right user interface(UI) to use for their solution. The focus however is on Blazor and in particular for webAssembly. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago