Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cypress.io VS AccessLint

Compare Cypress.io VS AccessLint and see what are their differences

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

AccessLint logo AccessLint

AccessLint finds accessibility issues in your GitHub PRs
  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17
  • AccessLint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-25

Cypress.io features and specs

  • Easy Setup and Configuration
    Cypress.io is known for its straightforward setup process, requiring minimal configuration to get started with writing and running tests, making it very accessible for developers new to end-to-end testing.
  • Real-time Reloads
    Cypress offers real-time reloading of tests, which improves the development experience by allowing instant feedback on test results as code changes are made.
  • Time Travel Debugging
    Cypress provides the ability to 'time travel' through tests by taking snapshots of the application state at different steps, making it easier to debug and understand failures.
  • Automatic Waiting
    Tests in Cypress automatically wait for commands and assertions, eliminating the need for manual waits and helping to avoid flaky tests due to timing issues.
  • Built-in Mocking and Stubbing
    Cypress has built-in capabilities for mocking and stubbing network requests, which simplifies testing of applications that depend on various services and APIs.
  • Rich Documentation and Community Support
    Cypress boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Cross Browser Testing
    Cypress supports testing in multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cypress.io

  • Limited Browser Support
    Although Cypress supports several major browsers, it does not support legacy browsers like Internet Explorer, which can be a disadvantage for projects that require testing across a wider range of browsers.
  • No Native Mobile App Testing
    Cypress does not natively support mobile app testing, limiting its use for projects that need end-to-end testing on mobile platforms.
  • Heavy Memory Usage
    Cypress can consume significant system resources, particularly memory, which may impact performance during large or complex test runs.
  • Limited Parallelism
    By default, Cypress's parallel execution capabilities are limited, which can slow down the test suite execution for larger projects, although this can be mitigated with the Dashboard Service (a paid feature).
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic tests are easy to set up, leveraging advanced features like custom commands, plugins, and complex test setups can require a steeper learning curve.
  • Incompatibility with Some Testing Ecosystems
    Cypress's architecture and testing approach can sometimes cause compatibility issues with certain testing frameworks and libraries, particularly those that are tightly coupled with traditional WebDriver-based tools.

AccessLint features and specs

  • Automatic Accessibility Checks
    AccessLint automates the process of checking for accessibility issues in web applications, helping developers ensure compliance with accessibility standards efficiently.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    The tool integrates well with continuous integration and deployment pipelines, enabling seamless accessibility testing as part of the development workflow.
  • Detailed Issue Reporting
    AccessLint provides detailed reports on accessibility issues, making it easier for developers to understand and address the problems.
  • Saves Time
    By automating accessibility checks, AccessLint saves significant time for developers compared to manual testing.

Possible disadvantages of AccessLint

  • Dependency on Automated Tools
    AccessLint relies on automated tools which might not catch all accessibility issues, especially those requiring manual verification such as color contrast or logical flow.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated testing tools, AccessLint may produce false positives or negatives, which could lead to confusion or unnecessary work.
  • Requires Initial Setup
    Integrating AccessLint into a development workflow requires initial setup and configuration, which might be a hurdle for some teams.
  • Limited Scope
    AccessLint's automated checks are limited to certain types of issues, potentially missing out on a comprehensive analysis of accessibility.

Analysis of Cypress.io

Overall verdict

  • Cypress.io is considered a good testing tool for developers due to its efficiency, ease of use, and robust testing capabilities. Its growing community and continuous updates make it a worthwhile choice for web testing.

Why this product is good

  • Cypress.io is a powerful end-to-end testing framework for web applications. It offers a user-friendly interface, excellent documentation, and provides fast and reliable testing with real-time reloads and debugging. It also integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and supports modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue.js.

Recommended for

  • Frontend developers who need to test web applications.
  • Teams looking for a reliable end-to-end testing solution.
  • Projects using modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.js.
  • Developers who require a tool with extensive documentation and community support.

Cypress.io videos

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

AccessLint videos

Install AccessLint for GitHub Accessibility Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cypress.io and AccessLint)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
SEO
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
95 95%
5% 5
Website Testing
94 94%
6% 6

User comments

Share your experience with using Cypress.io and AccessLint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cypress.io and AccessLint

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

AccessLint Reviews

We have no reviews of AccessLint yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cypress.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cypress.io mentions (27)

  • Ensuring Web Accessibility with Cypress: A Comprehensive Guide
    Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

AccessLint mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AccessLint yet. Tracking of AccessLint recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cypress.io and AccessLint, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

HTML Validator - HTML Validator is a Mozilla extension that adds HTML validation inside Firefox and Mozilla.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

Rocket Validator - Site-wide Accessibility and HTML validation made easy. With a single click, Rocket Validator will check thousands of web pages on your site for Accessibility and HTML conformance, producing a detailed, actionable report on seconds.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

W3C Markup Validation Service - Validates HTML markup of web pages, one at a time.