CyberFlood VS Reflect.run
Compare CyberFlood VS Reflect.run and see what are their differences
Create FREE one-page sites with limey.io.
Receive gifts. Capture leads. Share your favorite photos. All in a matter of minutes.
featured
CyberFlood
dotCover
DevTest
ReadyAPI Performance
QAComplete
Ghost Inspector
LEAPWORK
CucumberStudio
Reflect.run
Selenium
Testim
Ghost Inspector
Cypress.io
PreFlight
Testsigma
BugBug.io
Reflect is a tool that helps you test any website without writing any code. All you need to create a test is a URL. Our cloud-based browser allows you to interact with your website just like a normal browser. Behind the scenes, Reflect captures all of your actions and builds a repeatable test script. When you're finished, you can run that test script whenever you want within our automated platform. So, if you can use your site, you can test your site.
Reflect supports nearly all browser interactions out-of-the-box, including hovers and drag-and-drops. It offers visual assertions for ensuring the appearance of your webapp, and includes test editing functionality and API access.
CyberFlood Reflect.runNo features have been listed yet.
Based on our record, Reflect.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Playwright is good but there is also other kind of tools like https://reflect.run/ and https://ghostinspector.com/ that are perfect for end user testing. Hope it helps. Source: about 1 year ago
Is it possible to personalize your pitches to individual users? At our startup [1] we try to get straight to point when pitching the product and demo something that is as close as possible to how the person we're talking to would actually use the product. For example, here's a video I just recorded a few minutes ago for someone that I've been talking to via email:... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I've definitely had reflect.run on my radar, and agreed on the expensive AF part, mind if I reach out for your thoughts on what lead you/your team down to reflect.run and your experience with it so far? 😄. Source: about 2 years ago
Checkout reflect.run we just started using it. Expensive AF but pretty nice. Source: about 2 years ago
Yes definitely, there's lots of products in the QA space trying to tackle the problem you're describing. I'm a co-founder of a no-code product in the space (https://reflect.run). Being no-code has the advantage of enabling all QA testers to build test automation, regardless of coding experience. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
dotCover - JetBrains dotCover is a .NET unit test runner and code coverage tool that integrates with Visual Studio.
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
DevTest - Test management solution for efficient quality assurance
Testim - Stable, self-healing, end-to-end test automation via machine learning. Testim helps accelerate the delivery of high-quality software. Speed up test-authoring and improve the stability of automated, end-to-end tests.
ReadyAPI Performance - ReadyAPI Performance is a platform that offers Load Testing for REST and SOAP APIs, Microservices, and Databases.
Ghost Inspector - Easily create automated browser tests for your websites and web apps. Ensure everything works and looks the way it should. No coding required. 14 day free trial!