Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CXGuardian VS react-testing-library

Compare CXGuardian VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CXGuardian logo CXGuardian

CXGuardian is a platform powered by QualityKiosk Technologies and allows users to monitor their mobile and web-based applications’ performance.

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
Not present
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

CXGuardian features and specs

  • Real-time Monitoring
    CXGuardian offers real-time tracking of customer experience, allowing businesses to address issues as they arise.
  • Comprehensive Analytics
    The platform provides detailed analytics and reports, enabling businesses to make informed decisions based on customer interactions.
  • User-friendly Interface
    CXGuardian has an intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features.
  • Scalability
    The platform can handle varying amounts of data, making it suitable for businesses of different sizes.
  • Customizable Alerts
    Users can set up personalized alerts to notify them of specific customer experience metrics or issues.

Possible disadvantages of CXGuardian

  • Cost
    The price of using CXGuardian may be prohibitive for smaller businesses or startups.
  • Complex Setup Process
    Initial setup can be complex and time-consuming, requiring dedicated resources to fully implement.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    CXGuardian requires a stable internet connection to function effectively, which may be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, some advanced features may have a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    The platform primarily functions online, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionalities.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

CXGuardian videos

No CXGuardian videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

react-testing-library videos

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CXGuardian and react-testing-library)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CXGuardian and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 133 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CXGuardian mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CXGuardian yet. Tracking of CXGuardian recommendations started around Jun 2021.

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CXGuardian and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

Plumbr - Plumbr is an application performance platform that provides insights to users on the performance of their applications.

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

AppOptics - Application performance management and infrastructure monitoring.

Storybook - Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

logit.io - Logit.io provides complete observability of logs, metrics and traces. The platform also offers alerting & monitoring, as well as Prometheus, OpenSearch & Grafana. Ingest any type of data to see real-time insights about your applications and services

Vitest - A blazing fast unit test framework powered by Vite