Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CVS (Concurrent Versions System) VS TeamCoherence

Compare CVS (Concurrent Versions System) VS TeamCoherence and see what are their differences

CVS (Concurrent Versions System) logo CVS (Concurrent Versions System)

CVS is a centralized version control system, an important component of Source Configuration...

TeamCoherence logo TeamCoherence

Source Control, Version Control and Bug Tracking
  • CVS (Concurrent Versions System) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-23
  • TeamCoherence Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

CVS (Concurrent Versions System) features and specs

  • Wide Adoption and Mature
    CVS has been around for a long time, making it a mature version control system with a large user base. This means extensive documentation and community support are available.
  • Simplicity
    CVS is relatively simple to use, which makes it suitable for projects that do not require complex version control features.
  • Compatibility
    CVS is compatible with many legacy systems and can be easily integrated into older development workflows.
  • Client-Server Architecture
    CVS supports a client-server architecture, which allows for collaborative development across different teams and geographical locations.

Possible disadvantages of CVS (Concurrent Versions System)

  • Lack of Atomic Operations
    CVS does not support atomic commits, which means partial commits can occur if a commit process is interrupted, potentially leading to inconsistent repository states.
  • Poor Support for Renames and Moves
    CVS does not handle renaming or moving files efficiently, as it requires manual interventions to maintain the history of files.
  • Single Branch Development
    CVS has limited support for branch management, which can complicate the development of larger projects where robust branching strategies are required.
  • Limited Merge Capabilities
    Merging in CVS can be challenging due to its less sophisticated merge support compared to modern version control systems.
  • Lack of Security Features
    CVS has fewer built-in security features, which may not meet the needs of projects requiring stringent access control and encryption.

TeamCoherence features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CVS (Concurrent Versions System) and TeamCoherence)
Git
68 68%
32% 32
Git Tools
57 57%
43% 43
Code Collaboration
68 68%
32% 32
Documentation
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CVS (Concurrent Versions System) and TeamCoherence. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CVS (Concurrent Versions System) and TeamCoherence, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Apache Subversion - Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Vault VCS - SourceGear Vault Pro is a version control and bug tracking solution for professional development teams. Vault Standard is for those who only want version control.

Fossil - Simple, high-reliability, distributed software configuration management

SmartGit - SmartGit is a front-end for the distributed version control system Git and runs on Windows, Mac OS...