Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Cucumber VS Telerik Test Studio

Compare Cucumber VS Telerik Test Studio and see what are their differences

Momen
Build powerful web apps, and create your custom AI apps, no code needed! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Cucumber logo Cucumber

Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Telerik Test Studio logo Telerik Test Studio

Test automation solution to test desktop, web and mobile applications.
  • Cucumber Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-19
  • Telerik Test Studio Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-04

Cucumber features and specs

  • Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Framework
    Cucumber supports BDD, allowing collaboration between developers, testers, and non-technical stakeholders to improve the quality of development through clear specifications.
  • Gherkin Syntax
    Utilizes the Gherkin language to write test cases in plain English, making them more readable and understandable for non-technical team members.
  • Integrates with Other Tools
    Easily integrates with other testing and development frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and Selenium, enhancing its flexibility and utility.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, Cucumber allows for extensive customization and community support, reducing the cost of setting up a testing framework.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    Offers support for various programming languages including Java, Ruby, and JavaScript, making it versatile for different project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Cucumber

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Requires a good understanding of both BDD practices and Cucumber’s structure, which might be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overheads
    Execution of Cucumber tests can be slower compared to other testing frameworks, making it less ideal for very large projects requiring fast feedback loops.
  • Verbose Code
    Writing tests in Gherkin can lead to more verbose code, which might require additional maintenance and can become cumbersome over time.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies for integrating Cucumber with other testing frameworks can be complex, requiring careful coordination.
  • Not Ideal for Unit Testing
    Cucumber is more suited for acceptance and integration testing rather than unit testing, potentially necessitating additional tools for a comprehensive testing strategy.

Telerik Test Studio features and specs

  • Comprehensive Test Automation
    Telerik Test Studio provides a comprehensive set of tools for functional, performance, load, and RESTful API testing, allowing teams to automate testing across multiple stages of the development lifecycle.
  • Intuitive User Interface
    The tool features an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it accessible to testers with varying levels of experience, reducing the learning curve for new users.
  • Support for Web and Desktop Applications
    Test Studio supports both web and desktop applications, enabling automation across a variety of platforms and technologies, which enhances its versatility within different project environments.
  • Seamless Integration
    It integrates well with popular development and CI/CD tools such as Visual Studio, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps, which facilitates smoother workflows and better collaboration across teams.
  • Codeless Test Creation
    Offers codeless test creation capabilities that allow testers to create automated tests without extensive programming knowledge, thus empowering broader team involvement in testing activities.

Possible disadvantages of Telerik Test Studio

  • Cost
    Telerik Test Studio can be expensive, especially for small or start-up teams, which might make it less accessible for organizations with limited budgets.
  • Performance Overhead
    There might be performance overhead during test execution, especially with complex test suites, which can slow down the testing process and lead to longer turnaround times.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are user-friendly, there may be a steep learning curve for more advanced features and customizations, which may require additional training or experience.
  • Limited Mobile Testing Support
    Test Studio has limited support for mobile application testing, which can be a drawback for teams primarily focused on developing mobile apps.
  • Dependency on Specific Configurations
    Some users have reported issues with dependencies on specific configurations or environments, which can lead to complications when setting up or migrating projects.

Cucumber videos

+ Add

Madam Kilay Skin Magical Review / Orange cucumber review

More videos:

  • Review - Puff Bar - Cucumber Review (Best Disposable Vape Brand)
  • Review - THE CUCUMBER CHALLENGE! (1 MILLION SUBSCRIBER SPECIAL)
  • Tutorial - Cucumber automation suit

Telerik Test Studio videos

+ Add

How to Test Web Applications with Telerik Test Studio Dev Edition

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Telerik Test Studio Webinar: How To Make Functional Automated Tests
  • Review - Telerik Test Studio R1 2020 Release Webinar

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cucumber and Telerik Test Studio)

Cucumber

Telerik Test Studio

Automated Testing
83 83%
Automated Testing
17% 17
Browser Testing
83 83%
Browser Testing
17% 17
Testing
89 89%
Testing
11% 11
Website Testing
78 78%
Website Testing
22% 22

User comments

Share your experience with using Cucumber and Telerik Test Studio. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cucumber and Telerik Test Studio

Cucumber Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
Cucumber itself is not a test automation tool but a framework that supports BDD. It is often used in conjunction with Selenium to provide a layer where test scenarios are written in a way that is understandable by all team members. Unlike Selenium, which focuses on automating browser actions, Cucumber focuses on defining behavior and can be used to drive Selenium tests.
Source: bugbug.io
5 Selenium Alternatives to Fill in Your Top Testing Gaps
Business testers are likely to prefer to use Cucumber over Selenium since script Cucumber lets you write test scenarios using a plain-English scripting language called Gherkin. Using Gherkin instead of code makes test script creation a much simpler process, since anyone can read, write, and understand the scripts regardless of testing experience.
Source: www.perfecto.io
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
Cucumber is an open-source tool that is designed over the concept of BDD (Behavior-driven development). It is used to perform the automated acceptance testing by running the examples that best describe the behavior of the application. It gets you a single up-to-date living document that is having both specification and test documentation.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Telerik Test Studio Reviews

Best Automation Testing Tools (Free and Paid) | July 2022
Telerik Test Studio is а test automation platform for web, desktop and responsive web applications. It ensure quality web and desktop apps that deliver the experiences users demand.
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cucumber seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cucumber mentions (1)

Telerik Test Studio mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Telerik Test Studio yet. Tracking of Telerik Test Studio recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cucumber and Telerik Test Studio, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Loading...