Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CUBA.platform VS Structr

Compare CUBA.platform VS Structr and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CUBA.platform logo CUBA.platform

A Full Stack Enterprise Java Framework with lots of out of the box functionality and amazing...

Structr logo Structr

Open-source data CMS platform.
  • CUBA.platform Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26
  • Structr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-27

CUBA.platform features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    CUBA.platform is designed to accelerate the development process by providing high-level abstractions and out-of-the-box functionality, which reduces boilerplate code and development time.
  • Strong Security Features
    The platform includes robust security mechanisms, such as declarative role-based access control at both UI and entity levels, ensuring secure application architecture.
  • Rich Set of Tools
    CUBA Studio offers an integrated development environment that simplifies project setup, provides visual designers for the UI, and supports database management, making it easier for developers to work efficiently.
  • Flexibility and Extensibility
    Although it comes with a lot of features pre-built, CUBA.platform allows developers to extend and customize the framework to meet specific project requirements.
  • Strong Community and Support
    The platform has an active community and professional support options, providing valuable resources and assistance for developers.
  • Data-centric Approach
    It is particularly good for applications that are data-centric as it allows easy mapping of data models to the user interface with minimal effort.

Possible disadvantages of CUBA.platform

  • Learning Curve
    Because of its unique architecture and feature set, new users might experience a steep learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with full-stack Java development.
  • Limited Language Support
    Primarily designed for use with Java, which may not be suitable for teams looking to work with other programming languages.
  • Dependency on CUBA Studio
    While beneficial, the reliance on CUBA Studio means there could be limitations when integrating with other IDEs or development environments not specifically supported by the platform.
  • Cost for Enterprise Features
    While it offers many free features, some advanced enterprise functionalities require a paid subscription, which might be a consideration for budget-constrained projects.
  • Less Mainstream
    Compared to more popular frameworks, CUBA.platform has a smaller ecosystem, which may result in fewer third-party resources, libraries, or plugins available to developers.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For smaller applications with simple requirements, the depth and breadth of features offered by CUBA.platform might be overkill and lead to unnecessary complexity.

Structr features and specs

  • Full-Stack Solution
    Structr offers a cohesive full-stack solution, combining back-end and front-end capabilities into one package, which can simplify development and maintenance.
  • Graph Database Integration
    Structr is built on top of Neo4j, a leading graph database, allowing users to leverage graph data models and operations effectively.
  • Rapid Development
    With its low-code environment, Structr enables faster application development and prototyping, reducing time-to-market.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides a user-friendly interface that helps both developers and non-developers to design and manage applications without deep technical knowledge.
  • Flexibility
    Structr's customizable architecture supports diverse use cases and can be tailored to fit specific project requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Structr

  • Learning Curve
    While Structr offers extensive features, new users might face a significant learning curve before mastering its full potential.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to other development platforms, Structr has a smaller community, potentially leading to less community-based support and fewer third-party resources.
  • Dependency on Neo4j
    As Structr heavily relies on Neo4j, users must also have an understanding of Neo4j, which may require extra learning and adaptation.
  • Performance Constraints
    For very large and complex data sets, performance might be a concern, as graph databases like Neo4j can have limitations compared to traditional databases in certain scenarios.
  • Cost
    While there might be open-source components, additional features or enterprise-level solutions in Structr may involve licensing fees or additional costs.

Analysis of CUBA.platform

Overall verdict

  • Overall, CUBA Platform is considered a strong contender for developing enterprise-level applications, especially those that require complex business logic and data management. Its ease of use and powerful tooling make it a solid choice for teams looking to accelerate their development process.

Why this product is good

  • CUBA Platform is widely regarded as a good choice for developing enterprise applications due to its comprehensive set of features, including a robust framework for creating complex business applications. It offers a high level of abstraction, which simplifies the development process, saving time for developers. The platform provides built-in support for various features like user management, data access, and responsive interfaces. Additionally, it has a supportive community and extensive documentation, which can be particularly beneficial for developers looking to quickly get up to speed or troubleshoot issues.

Recommended for

    CUBA Platform is recommended for businesses and developers who are building enterprise-tier applications that demand robust data handling, custom workflows, and extensive user interfaces. It is especially suited for developers who prefer working with a framework that provides strong out-of-the-box solutions for common application needs and who appreciate a strong community and accessible resources to back them up.

CUBA.platform videos

+ Add

CUBA Platform Introduction

Structr videos

+ Add

Short intro demo video of Structr (6:23)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CUBA.platform and Structr)

CUBA.platform

Structr

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100
Software Development
100 100%
Software Development
0% 0
Document Collaboration
0 0%
Document Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CUBA.platform and Structr. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CUBA.platform and Structr, you can also consider the following products

OpenXava - OpenXava is a Web Java Framework for Rapid Development of Enterprise Applications.

Acquia - Acquia is a commercial open-source software that provides products, services and technical support for the open source Drupal social publishing system.

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.

Adobe Experience Manager - Adobe Experience Manager is a cross-platform CMS that works across websites, mobile apps and on-site displays.

Grails - An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM

Ideagen Easysite - Ideagen Easysite is secure, user-friendly and reliable web and enterprise content management system software.

Loading...