Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: about 1 year ago

> Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 1 year ago

I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: almost 2 years ago

🔺 A curated collection of 57 free shapes examples made with pure CSS: 👉 https://getcssscan.com/css-shapes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

I think Neumorphism can be used in certain situations, but there are quite a lot of accessibility issues. With that being said, I actually built an open-source UI kit based on Neumorphism, if you want to check it out in action. Source: almost 3 years ago

Dribbble is all over the place with glassmorphism posts, more and more articles are being written about it, and honestly it kind of feels like a gold rush at the moment. We have also built a UI kit based on neumorphism last year, but to be honest, it was and still is a controversial trend. That doesn’t mean that it can’t be used in some situations, but surely it can’t be used for just any website. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago