CSS Next VS Cowboy

The author of the most popular PostCSS plugin himself recommended the postcss-preset-env over his own creation which is cssnex, and. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Switching from a ready-made tool like Sass or a recommendation package like cssnext (deprecated since 2019) or PostCSS Preset Env (archived in 2022), to the modular PostCSS Preset Env plugin set we can choose a helpful and convenient set of future CSS features beyond the current stable client CSS. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

According to the 'Server' response header, Cowboy is the customer facing web server Https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy. Source: over 2 years ago

===> sh(git clone -n https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy .tmp_dir636214859401) Failed with return code 128 and the following output: Cloning into '.tmp_dir636214859401'... Fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/': SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate. Source: over 2 years ago

RE: HTTP/Web Sockets/TCP/UDP/etc. - check out NineNines libraries: Ranch (TCP Socket Acceptor), Cowboy (HTTP Server), Gun (HTTP client), and CowLib (General HTTP/SPDY library) are pretty good from what I hear. Source: over 2 years ago

Ranch is a pretty well optimized and battle hardened tcp acceptor. It powers the Cowboy/Phoenix server which scales to extreme level of concurrency and low latency. Cowboy uses ranch to pool and accept connections and I believe it uses {active,once}. https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy https://github.com/ninenines/ranch. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I have a web application which uses cowboy and cachex every so often cachex errors, which means my server returns a 500. Source: over 2 years ago