Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
CSS

CSS-Crush VS Garden (Clojure)

Compare CSS-Crush VS Garden (Clojure) and see what are their differences

Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

CSS-Crush logo CSS-Crush

A standards inspired CSS pre-processor. Written in PHP.

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.
  • CSS-Crush Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17

CSS-Crush features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Garden (Clojure) features and specs

  • Clojure Interoperability
    Garden leverages Clojure's syntax and functional programming paradigms, enabling seamless integration with Clojure applications and allowing developers to utilize Clojure's features, such as macros and immutable data structures.
  • Powerful Abstraction
    Garden provides a high-level abstraction for styling, which allows developers to compose styles dynamically and programmatically. This can lead to more maintainable and reusable code compared to traditional CSS.
  • Live Reloading
    Garden integrates well with tools like Figwheel for hot reloading, allowing developers to see changes in styles immediately without refreshing the browser, which boosts productivity.
  • Code as Data
    By treating CSS as data, Garden allows for the manipulation and transformation of styles with the full power of Clojure's data processing capabilities, enabling complex style logic that would be cumbersome in vanilla CSS.

Possible disadvantages of Garden (Clojure)

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with Clojure, the syntax and concepts might present a barrier to entry, requiring a learning period before being able to effectively use Garden.
  • Limited Adoption
    As a niche tool within the Clojure ecosystem, Garden has a smaller user base and community compared to more mainstream CSS preprocessors like SASS or LESS, which can limit the availability of community resources and plugins.
  • Performance Overhead
    Generating styles dynamically might add to the initial rendering time compared to static style sheets, which can be a concern for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Debugging Complexity
    The abstraction and dynamic nature of Garden can make debugging CSS issues more complex, as it is not as straightforward as inspecting static CSS rules in browser developer tools.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS-Crush and Garden (Clojure))

CSS-Crush

Garden (Clojure)

Design Tools
47 47%
Design Tools
53% 53
CSS Framework
34 34%
CSS Framework
66% 66
Developer Tools
42 42%
Developer Tools
58% 58
Development Tools
34 34%
Development Tools
66% 66

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS-Crush and Garden (Clojure). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Garden (Clojure) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS-Crush mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS-Crush yet. Tracking of CSS-Crush recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS-Crush and Garden (Clojure), you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Less - Less extends CSS with dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. Less runs on both the server-side (with Node. js and Rhino) or client-side (modern browsers only).

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Loading...