Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login
CSS

CSS-Crush VS Garden (Clojure)

Compare CSS-Crush VS Garden (Clojure) and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the most powerful free 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

CSS-Crush logo CSS-Crush

A standards inspired CSS pre-processor. Written in PHP.

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.
  • CSS-Crush Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS-Crush and Garden (Clojure))

CSS-Crush

Garden (Clojure)

CSS Framework
30 30%
CSS Framework
70% 70
Design Tools
33 33%
Design Tools
67% 67
Developer Tools
30 30%
Developer Tools
70% 70
Development Tools
40 40%
Development Tools
60% 60

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS-Crush and Garden (Clojure). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Garden (Clojure) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS-Crush mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS-Crush yet. Tracking of CSS-Crush recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS-Crush and Garden (Clojure), you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Less - Less extends CSS with dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. Less runs on both the server-side (with Node. js and Rhino) or client-side (modern browsers only).

Loading...