Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
CSS

CSS-Crush VS CSS Next

Compare CSS-Crush VS CSS Next and see what are their differences

TimeLake.io
Improve team performance continuously with time tracking automation. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

CSS-Crush logo CSS-Crush

A standards inspired CSS pre-processor. Written in PHP.

CSS Next logo CSS Next

Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.
  • CSS-Crush Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • CSS Next Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-22

CSS-Crush features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CSS Next features and specs

  • Future CSS Features
    CSS Next allows developers to use the latest CSS syntax and features that may not yet be supported by all browsers, enabling progressive enhancement and future-proofing stylesheets.
  • Simplified Syntax
    By using future CSS features, developers can write more concise and expressive code, making stylesheets easier to read and maintain.
  • Polyfills and Transpilation
    CSS Next automatically provides polyfills and transpiles CSS so that the latest features can be used even in environments that do not yet support them natively.
  • Improved Workflow
    With CSS Next, developers can directly utilize tools that help improve styling workflows, such as variables, custom selectors, and media queries, more conveniently.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Next

  • Dependency on Tooling
    CSS Next requires a build process for transpilation, which adds complexity and dependencies to project setup and maintenance.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The polyfills and transpilation process can introduce a performance overhead during development and build times, affecting the speed of initial setup.
  • Limited Support for Older Browsers
    While CSS Next helps bring future features to more browsers, it might not fully support significantly older browsers, necessitating additional fallbacks or workarounds.
  • Project Activity and Maintenance
    Due to changes in the web development landscape and focus shifts, CSS Next might not be actively maintained, potentially leading developers to use alternatives like PostCSS or native CSS features as they become available.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS-Crush and CSS Next)

CSS-Crush

CSS Next

Developer Tools
26 26%
Developer Tools
74% 74
Design Tools
30 30%
Design Tools
70% 70
CSS Framework
26 26%
CSS Framework
74% 74
Development Tools
100 100%
Development Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS-Crush and CSS Next. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CSS Next seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS-Crush mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS-Crush yet. Tracking of CSS-Crush recommendations started around Mar 2021.

CSS Next mentions (2)

  • PostCSS - my initial experience
    The author of the most popular PostCSS plugin himself recommended the postcss-preset-env over his own creation which is cssnex, and. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Vanilla+PostCSS as an Alternative to SCSS
    Switching from a ready-made tool like Sass or a recommendation package like cssnext (deprecated since 2019) or PostCSS Preset Env (archived in 2022), to the modular PostCSS Preset Env plugin set we can choose a helpful and convenient set of future CSS features beyond the current stable client CSS. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS-Crush and CSS Next, you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Garden (Clojure) - Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Less - Less extends CSS with dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. Less runs on both the server-side (with Node. js and Rhino) or client-side (modern browsers only).

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Loading...