Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Crystal (programming language) VS Scala.js

Compare Crystal (programming language) VS Scala.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Crystal (programming language) logo Crystal (programming language)

Programming language with Ruby-like syntax that compiles to efficient native code.

Scala.js logo Scala.js

Build robust front-end web applications in Scala with Scala.js
  • Crystal (programming language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-26
  • Scala.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-23

Crystal (programming language) features and specs

  • Performance
    Crystal is designed to have the performance of C, thanks to its compilation to efficient native code. Its static type system and low-level memory management capabilities allow optimized execution.
  • Syntax
    Crystal offers a syntax that is heavily inspired by Ruby, making it intuitive and familiar for Ruby developers. This can significantly reduce the learning curve and improve developer productivity.
  • Type Inference
    Crystal provides powerful type inference, enabling developers to write less boilerplate code while still benefiting from the safety and performance of a statically-typed language.
  • Concurrency
    Crystal supports lightweight concurrency with fibers, which allows developers to write efficient and scalable concurrent programs with a simpler syntax compared to traditional threading models.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Crystal has an active and growing community. It also boasts a rich ecosystem with libraries and tools, making it easier for developers to find resources and support.

Possible disadvantages of Crystal (programming language)

  • Maturity
    Crystal is still a relatively young language compared to more established languages like Python or Java. This can mean fewer resources, libraries, and tools, as well as potential instability in certain areas.
  • Compilation Time
    Crystal's compilation times can be slower compared to interpreted languages, particularly for larger codebases. This can impact development workflows and iteration speed.
  • Binary Size
    Compiled Crystal programs tend to generate larger binary sizes compared to other compiled languages like Go or Rust. This can be a consideration for resource-constrained environments.
  • Platform Support
    Being less mature, Crystal may have fewer options for platform-specific optimizations and integrations, which could limit its use in certain specialized applications.
  • Tooling
    Although the situation is improving, Crystal's tooling ecosystem is not as mature as those of older languages. This can affect the availability and quality of IDE support, debugging tools, and other development aids.

Scala.js features and specs

  • Strong Type System
    Scala.js brings Scala’s powerful type system to JavaScript development, reducing runtime errors and enhancing code reliability and safety.
  • Interoperability with JavaScript
    Seamlessly interoperates with JavaScript libraries and frameworks, allowing developers to utilize existing JavaScript tools and APIs.
  • Code Reusability
    Facilitates code sharing between server and client-side codebases when using Scala on both ends, increasing productivity and maintainability.
  • Functional Programming
    Supports functional programming paradigms which can lead to more concise and expressive code compared to traditional JavaScript.
  • Ecosystem
    Access to a wide range of Scala libraries thanks to the ability to use JVM-based libraries, enhanced by the 'Scala.js-specific libraries'.

Possible disadvantages of Scala.js

  • Build Complexity
    Requires a more complex build setup compared to vanilla JavaScript projects, introducing a learning curve for new developers.
  • Performance Overhead
    The additional abstraction layer can sometimes result in performance overhead when compared to native JavaScript.
  • Community and Support
    Smaller community compared to JavaScript, which can result in fewer resources, tutorials, and community support for problem-solving.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers need to learn Scala, which might be difficult for those not familiar with functional programming and type safety concepts.
  • Tooling Limitations
    Though improving, tooling support, especially for debugging in a pure Scala.js environment, might not be as robust as native JavaScript tools.

Crystal (programming language) videos

No Crystal (programming language) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Scala.js videos

Deriving the Frontend — Form Combinator Fun with Scala.js

More videos:

  • Review - Laminar – Smooth UI Development with Scala.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Crystal (programming language) and Scala.js)
Programming Language
100 100%
0% 0
Personal Finance
0 0%
100% 100
OOP
100 100%
0% 0
Financial Planner
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Crystal (programming language) and Scala.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crystal (programming language) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 114 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Crystal (programming language) mentions (114)

  • Rhombus Language
    Did you ever see Crystal? It's more or less a typed Ruby. I've heard that you can port some code directly. https://crystal-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Tiny JITs for a Faster FFI
    If you like the Ruby syntax (but want a statically typed language), you might want to take a look at Crystal: https://crystal-lang.org/ > Crystal is statically typed and type errors are caught early by the compiler, eliminating a range of type-related errors at runtime. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Advent of Code #1 (in Gleam)
    I really enjoyed using Crystal last year. It is a very ergonomic language with a featureful standard library. I was tempted to use it again this year, but I figured I should use this opportunity to try something new. After considering several languages including Go, F#, Nim, and Raku, I decided to go with Gleam. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Understanding Ruby 3.3 Concurrency: A Comprehensive Guide
    Also check https://crystal-lang.org/ which aims for ruby like syntax/dx but almost native performance. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Crystal 1.11.0 Is Released
    I like the first code example on https://crystal-lang.org
        # A very basic HTTP server.
    - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Scala.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Scala.js yet. Tracking of Scala.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Crystal (programming language) and Scala.js, you can also consider the following products

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

V (programming language) - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.

Haste - Decreases ping in video games.