Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Crystal (programming language) VS Pug

Compare Crystal (programming language) VS Pug and see what are their differences

CobbleStone Software
Managing contracts just got easier with CobbleStone! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Crystal (programming language) logo Crystal (programming language)

Programming language with Ruby-like syntax that compiles to efficient native code.

Pug logo Pug

Pug is a robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for Node.js
  • Crystal (programming language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-26
  • Pug Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

Crystal (programming language) features and specs

  • Performance
    Crystal is designed to have the performance of C, thanks to its compilation to efficient native code. Its static type system and low-level memory management capabilities allow optimized execution.
  • Syntax
    Crystal offers a syntax that is heavily inspired by Ruby, making it intuitive and familiar for Ruby developers. This can significantly reduce the learning curve and improve developer productivity.
  • Type Inference
    Crystal provides powerful type inference, enabling developers to write less boilerplate code while still benefiting from the safety and performance of a statically-typed language.
  • Concurrency
    Crystal supports lightweight concurrency with fibers, which allows developers to write efficient and scalable concurrent programs with a simpler syntax compared to traditional threading models.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Crystal has an active and growing community. It also boasts a rich ecosystem with libraries and tools, making it easier for developers to find resources and support.

Possible disadvantages of Crystal (programming language)

  • Maturity
    Crystal is still a relatively young language compared to more established languages like Python or Java. This can mean fewer resources, libraries, and tools, as well as potential instability in certain areas.
  • Compilation Time
    Crystal's compilation times can be slower compared to interpreted languages, particularly for larger codebases. This can impact development workflows and iteration speed.
  • Binary Size
    Compiled Crystal programs tend to generate larger binary sizes compared to other compiled languages like Go or Rust. This can be a consideration for resource-constrained environments.
  • Platform Support
    Being less mature, Crystal may have fewer options for platform-specific optimizations and integrations, which could limit its use in certain specialized applications.
  • Tooling
    Although the situation is improving, Crystal's tooling ecosystem is not as mature as those of older languages. This can affect the availability and quality of IDE support, debugging tools, and other development aids.

Pug features and specs

  • Simplified Syntax
    Pug offers a simplified and clean syntax compared to standard HTML, omitting the need for closing tags and reducing the repetitive structure, which makes it easier to write and read.
  • Code Reusability
    Pug supports mixins and includes, which allow for the reuse of code snippets and components throughout the templates, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Logic in Templates
    It provides the ability to incorporate JavaScript logic directly within the templates, allowing for dynamic content generation and more interactive pages.
  • Compatibility with Existing JavaScript
    Pug integrates smoothly with Node.js and JavaScript applications, making it easy to use within popular frameworks like Express.
  • Efficient Compilation
    Pug compiles templates into highly optimized JavaScript code, resulting in fast rendering performance in web applications.

Possible disadvantages of Pug

  • Learning Curve
    Pug's unique syntax can be initially challenging to learn and understand, especially for developers accustomed to traditional HTML.
  • Limited HTML Direct Use
    Due to its abstraction over HTML, developers might find it inconvenient when they need to use raw HTML elements or script tags that do not translate directly.
  • Debugging Complexity
    Debugging Pug templates can sometimes be more complex as errors may not be as apparent as in raw HTML, requiring familiarity with both Pug and the underlying HTML structure.
  • Dependency Management
    Using Pug adds another dependency to the project, and developers need to manage and maintain it alongside other packages, which can be an added overhead.
  • Not Universally Adopted
    While popular, Pug is not as universally adopted as raw HTML or some other templating languages, potentially resulting in fewer resources or community support.

Crystal (programming language) videos

No Crystal (programming language) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Pug videos

+ Add

Everything You Need to Know About Pugs - Characteristics and Care

More videos:

  • Review - Wolf Dog Reviews Food With Pug!
  • Review - Pug Dog Breed - Pros and Cons

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Crystal (programming language) and Pug)

Crystal (programming language)

Pug

Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
OOP
100 100%
OOP
0% 0
Development
25 25%
Development
75% 75

User comments

Share your experience with using Crystal (programming language) and Pug. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crystal (programming language) should be more popular than Pug. It has been mentiond 114 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Crystal (programming language) mentions (114)

  • Rhombus Language
    Did you ever see Crystal? It's more or less a typed Ruby. I've heard that you can port some code directly. https://crystal-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Tiny JITs for a Faster FFI
    If you like the Ruby syntax (but want a statically typed language), you might want to take a look at Crystal: https://crystal-lang.org/ > Crystal is statically typed and type errors are caught early by the compiler, eliminating a range of type-related errors at runtime. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Advent of Code #1 (in Gleam)
    I really enjoyed using Crystal last year. It is a very ergonomic language with a featureful standard library. I was tempted to use it again this year, but I figured I should use this opportunity to try something new. After considering several languages including Go, F#, Nim, and Raku, I decided to go with Gleam. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Understanding Ruby 3.3 Concurrency: A Comprehensive Guide
    Also check https://crystal-lang.org/ which aims for ruby like syntax/dx but almost native performance. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Crystal 1.11.0 Is Released
    I like the first code example on https://crystal-lang.org 
        # A very basic HTTP server.
    - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Pug mentions (21)

  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Building Vue Components With Pug & Stylus
    If you have a bit of Nodejs SSR background, you would already be accustomed to templating libraries like Pug, Handlebars, EJS, etc. If you’re from a PHP background you would be familiar with the Blade templating engine. These templating libraries basically help you render dynamic data from the backend on the frontend. They also help you generate markup with loops based on conditions. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Just Normal Web Things
    The right way to start is with HTML and motherfucking web site. https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ Really. At this point this is what web sites should strive to be. Pug is a great way to write HTML by hand. I integrated it with GitHub Pages so pug sources get compiled to HTML and published when commits are pushed. Great experience. https://pugjs.org/ - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Migrate Your Express Application to Fastify
    To illustrate the process of migrating from Express to Fastify, we have prepared a demo application. This application utilizes Express, Mongoose, and Pug to create a URL Shortener app as follows:. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Simplify Form Development with Smarkform!
    Disclaimer: The markup of CodePen examples is still in Pug. However, you can view it compiled as HTML by opening the code tab menu and selecting "View compiled HTML" (But, by the way, if you are not already familiar with Pug Templates, I strongly advise you to check them out). Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Crystal (programming language) and Pug, you can also consider the following products

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

Jinja2 - Jinja2 is a template engine written in Python.

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

V (programming language) - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.

jquery-template - A template plugin for jQuery. Allows templating without cluttering JavaScript code with markup.

Loading...