Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Crow framework VS NASM

Compare Crow framework VS NASM and see what are their differences

Crow framework logo Crow framework

C++ micro web framework inspired by Python Flask

NASM logo NASM

The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...
  • Crow framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24
  • NASM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11

Crow framework features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Crow is a very lightweight web framework designed for C++ which makes it suitable for high-performance applications where resource efficiency is important.
  • Header-only
    Being a header-only library, Crow is easy to integrate into existing C++ projects without the need for complex build configurations or additional dependencies.
  • C++14 Support
    Crow requires C++14, which allows developers to use some modern C++ features that can help with writing more efficient and cleaner code.
  • Ease of Use
    The framework offers a simple and straightforward API that makes setting up HTTP routes and handling requests more convenient compared to other more complex alternatives.
  • Good for Prototyping
    Crow's simplicity and ease of setup make it a good choice for quickly prototyping web applications in C++.

Possible disadvantages of Crow framework

  • Limited Features
    Crow may not have as many built-in features as some more established frameworks, making it necessary to implement certain functionalities manually.
  • Community and Support
    The community around Crow is not as large as other more popular frameworks, which might limit the availability of community support and third-party resources.
  • Lack of Official Documentation
    Crow's documentation may not be as comprehensive or up-to-date as other frameworks, which could hinder learning and development for new users.
  • Platform-Specific Limitations
    Being a C++ framework, Crow might face platform-specific issues, and ensuring cross-platform compatibility may require additional effort.
  • Single-Threaded by Default
    Crow is single-threaded by default, which could be a limitation for handling a large number of concurrent connections, although multithreaded operation can be configured.

NASM features and specs

  • Standardization
    NASM (Netwide Assembler) uses a standard and simple syntax that is consistent across different platforms and projects, making it easier for programmers to read and write assembly code.
  • Cross-Platform
    NASM supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing developers to write assembly code that can be assembled on different platforms.
  • Wide Compatibility
    NASM is compatible with numerous output formats such as ELF, COFF, and Mach-O, which makes it versatile for different types of development, including system-level programming and application software.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, NASM allows developers to contribute to its development or adapt it to fit specific needs, granting a high degree of flexibility and customization.
  • Active Community
    NASM has an active user and developer community, providing extensive support, resources, and regular updates that help address issues and enhance features.

Possible disadvantages of NASM

  • Low-Level Language
    Writing in assembly language, including NASM, is inherently low-level, making it complex and time-consuming compared to high-level programming languages.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    NASM requires a significant understanding of assembly language and computer architecture, which may present a steep learning curve for beginners.
  • Error-Prone
    Due to its low-level nature, development in NASM is prone to errors, such as memory management bugs, which can be difficult to debug.
  • Limited Use Cases
    While powerful, NASM is generally used for specific use cases like embedded systems, operating system development, or performance-critical applications, limiting its utility for general software development.
  • Maintenance Difficulty
    Assembly code is less maintainable over time compared to high-level languages, as it can be harder for developers to understand and update long after it was originally written.

Crow framework videos

No Crow framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

NASM videos

Why you should NOT get the NASM CPT || Certification

More videos:

  • Review - NASM CPT Certification | Chapter 1-20 Review |SHOW UP FITNESS PASS NASM GUARANTEED ONLINE INTERNSHIP
  • Review - NASM CPT review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Crow framework and NASM)
Project Management
42 42%
58% 58
IDE
28 28%
72% 72
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Crow framework and NASM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crow framework should be more popular than NASM. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Crow framework mentions (6)

  • VueJS goes to microcontroller firmware. This website runs in ESP32 board, with frontend is made with VueJS, TailwindCSS and backend is written in C++.
    I did something similar in the past and used https://github.com/ipkn/crow as web server, in case you want to not implement the web part yourself. Otherwise amazing job! Source: about 2 years ago
  • C++ to Browser JS Framework Recommendations
    Open socket, serve a html page, implement GET/PUT or find framework that do https://github.com/ipkn/crow. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • I forked Crow, an abandoned C++ Web Framework. And I'm currently maintaining it.
    Last year I was looking to port a Flask REST API I made to C++ because speed and why not. I went through a few C++ frameworks but eventually chose the abandoned since 2017 Crow. It was by far the easiest to set up and work with (being inspired by Flask in the first place), and it didn't hurt that it supported Websockets. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • C++ vs C# .net 5
    All right Op feel free to check this micro framework out if your company is going to build a rest api in C++ https://github.com/ipkn/crow . Source: almost 4 years ago
  • cpprestsdk in maintenance mode
    I haven't used any of the following libraries/frameworks but maybe some of them will fit for your needs: - Crow micro web framework. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

NASM mentions (3)

  • How to improve at x86/C?
    Try https://nasm.us/ as a modern way to use assembly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Help needed for asm related project
    Assembly is machine specific, have a look at NASM for a more generic assembly language. https://nasm.us/. Source: about 2 years ago
  • vcpkg now (finally) has site with search functionality
    I have a weird problem: when I try using vcpkg on my work laptop, it cannot download nasm. Instead of nasm, I get an HTML page that explains that I am kept safe and secure by CSIS who blocked downloads from this dangerous domain. Vcpkg barfs on the HTML file (as it should). Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Crow framework and NASM, you can also consider the following products

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

Yasm - Yasm is a complete rewrite of the NASM assembler.

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

PCem - PCem emulates an IBM 5150 PC, several models of clones and successors, along with various graphics...

Cutelyst - Qt-based web framework using the elegant approach of Catalyst framework

flat assembler - A fast and efficient self-assembling x86 assembler for DOS, Windows and Linux.