Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

flat assembler VS Crow framework

Compare flat assembler VS Crow framework and see what are their differences

flat assembler logo flat assembler

A fast and efficient self-assembling x86 assembler for DOS, Windows and Linux.

Crow framework logo Crow framework

C++ micro web framework inspired by Python Flask
  • flat assembler Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-28
  • Crow framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

flat assembler features and specs

  • Size and Speed
    Flat Assembler (FASM) is known for its small size and fast execution, making it an excellent choice for developers looking for efficiency in both development and runtime.
  • Low-Level Control
    FASM provides developers with in-depth control over the hardware, allowing for optimization and manipulation at a granular level, which can be critical for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Cross-Platform Capabilities
    FASM supports multiple platforms, enabling developers to write assembly code that can be compiled on different operating systems without significant changes.
  • Integrated Assembler and IDE
    It comes with an integrated development environment that simplifies assembling and linking processes, which can enhance productivity.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The assembler is well-documented with comprehensive guides, reducing the learning curve for new users and providing valuable resources for advanced programming.

Possible disadvantages of flat assembler

  • Learning Curve
    FASM requires a good understanding of assembly language and low-level programming, which can be a steep learning curve for beginners.
  • Limited High-Level Features
    As a low-level assembler, FASM lacks the abstractions and conveniences of high-level programming languages, which can make complex application development cumbersome.
  • Community and Support
    FASM has a smaller community compared to more mainstream programming tools, which can result in less available support and fewer third-party libraries.
  • Platform-Specific Optimization
    While cross-platform, achieving optimal performance can require platform-specific adjustments, adding complexity to the development process.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging assembly code can be challenging and time-consuming due to the low-level nature of the language and the increased possibility of hard-to-trace bugs.

Crow framework features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Crow is a very lightweight web framework designed for C++ which makes it suitable for high-performance applications where resource efficiency is important.
  • Header-only
    Being a header-only library, Crow is easy to integrate into existing C++ projects without the need for complex build configurations or additional dependencies.
  • C++14 Support
    Crow requires C++14, which allows developers to use some modern C++ features that can help with writing more efficient and cleaner code.
  • Ease of Use
    The framework offers a simple and straightforward API that makes setting up HTTP routes and handling requests more convenient compared to other more complex alternatives.
  • Good for Prototyping
    Crow's simplicity and ease of setup make it a good choice for quickly prototyping web applications in C++.

Possible disadvantages of Crow framework

  • Limited Features
    Crow may not have as many built-in features as some more established frameworks, making it necessary to implement certain functionalities manually.
  • Community and Support
    The community around Crow is not as large as other more popular frameworks, which might limit the availability of community support and third-party resources.
  • Lack of Official Documentation
    Crow's documentation may not be as comprehensive or up-to-date as other frameworks, which could hinder learning and development for new users.
  • Platform-Specific Limitations
    Being a C++ framework, Crow might face platform-specific issues, and ensuring cross-platform compatibility may require additional effort.
  • Single-Threaded by Default
    Crow is single-threaded by default, which could be a limitation for handling a large number of concurrent connections, although multithreaded operation can be configured.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to flat assembler and Crow framework)
IDE
63 63%
37% 37
Project Management
57 57%
43% 43
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using flat assembler and Crow framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crow framework should be more popular than flat assembler. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

flat assembler mentions (1)

  • Show HN: Torque – A lightweight meta-assembler for any processor
    Oh neat! Thanks for the link, I hadn't heard of fasmg before. It looks like fasmg builds up from the byte level, so it would only work for architectures that use 8-bit words. Torque builds up from the bit level, so it can assemble code for architectures like in PIC microcontrollers, using word sizes of 12 or 14 bits. However, fasmg does allow a lot more control over the syntax of the language. The documentation... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Crow framework mentions (6)

  • VueJS goes to microcontroller firmware. This website runs in ESP32 board, with frontend is made with VueJS, TailwindCSS and backend is written in C++.
    I did something similar in the past and used https://github.com/ipkn/crow as web server, in case you want to not implement the web part yourself. Otherwise amazing job! Source: about 2 years ago
  • C++ to Browser JS Framework Recommendations
    Open socket, serve a html page, implement GET/PUT or find framework that do https://github.com/ipkn/crow. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • I forked Crow, an abandoned C++ Web Framework. And I'm currently maintaining it.
    Last year I was looking to port a Flask REST API I made to C++ because speed and why not. I went through a few C++ frameworks but eventually chose the abandoned since 2017 Crow. It was by far the easiest to set up and work with (being inspired by Flask in the first place), and it didn't hurt that it supported Websockets. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • C++ vs C# .net 5
    All right Op feel free to check this micro framework out if your company is going to build a rest api in C++ https://github.com/ipkn/crow . Source: almost 4 years ago
  • cpprestsdk in maintenance mode
    I haven't used any of the following libraries/frameworks but maybe some of them will fit for your needs: - Crow micro web framework. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing flat assembler and Crow framework, you can also consider the following products

NASM - The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

PCem - PCem emulates an IBM 5150 PC, several models of clones and successors, along with various graphics...

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

Yasm - Yasm is a complete rewrite of the NASM assembler.

Cutelyst - Qt-based web framework using the elegant approach of Catalyst framework