CrossBrowserTesting VS Testize

CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Testize

Testize gage your webpage’s ease of use against at present acknowledged Internet gauges to recognize website appropriateness over numerous cell phones and programs.

Landing page //
2023-10-23

Landing page //
2023-02-01

CrossBrowserTesting

Website: crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing URL: Official CrossBrowserTesting Pricing

Edit details

Testize

Website: testize.com
Pricing URL: -

Edit details

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
Live Testing
Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
Automated Testing Integration
The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
Visual Testing
CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
Comprehensive Reports
Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
Parallel Testing
The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
Easy-to-Use Interface
The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

Cost
CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
Performance
Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
Limited Mobile Devices
While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
Learning Curve for Advanced Features
Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
Test Timeout Issues
Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Testize features and specs

User-Friendly Interface
Testize provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, which makes it accessible even for users without a technical background.
Comprehensive Test Management
It offers robust test management features including test planning, execution, and reporting, which are crucial for organized software testing.
Integration Capabilities
Testize integrates with popular tools like JIRA and Slack, enabling seamless communication and task management across platforms.
Automation Support
The platform supports automated testing, reducing manual effort and improving test accuracy and efficiency.
Scalability
Testize can handle projects of varying sizes, making it suitable for both small and large teams.

Possible disadvantages of Testize

Pricing
The cost of using Testize can be high for small teams or startups, restricting accessibility for budget-conscious organizations.
Customization Limitations
Some users may find the customization options limited, impacting the adaptability of the tool for specific needs.
Learning Curve
Despite its user-friendly interface, some advanced features may have a learning curve, requiring time and effort to master.
Performance Issues
Occasional performance issues such as lag or downtime can affect productivity during critical testing phases.
Limited Support for Niche Tools
Testize may not integrate well with less common or niche tools, potentially hindering teams with specialized requirements.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Testize videos

No Testize videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and Testize)

CrossBrowserTesting

Testize

Website Testing

85 85%

Website Testing

15% 15

Browser Testing

88 88%

Browser Testing

12% 12

Automated Testing

100 100%

Automated Testing

0% 0

Web Browsers

0 0%

Web Browsers

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Testize. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: over 2 years ago
great list of "cool" sites from hnews
Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 4 years ago