Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrossBrowserTesting VS JS Bin

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS JS Bin and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

JS Bin logo JS Bin

Sample of the bin:
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • JS Bin Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-09

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

JS Bin features and specs

  • Real-time Collaboration
    JS Bin allows multiple users to work on the same code simultaneously, making it easy for teams to collaborate on front-end projects in real-time.
  • Instant Preview
    Changes to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code are previewed instantly, allowing users to see the results of their work without manual refreshing or deploying.
  • Embed Feature
    Users can easily embed their bins into other web pages, making it convenient to share examples or demonstrate code snippets in blogs or documentation.
  • Debugging Tools
    JS Bin includes built-in debugging tools such as console log inspection, making it easier to identify and fix issues directly within the platform.
  • Customizable Environments
    Users can set up their preferred coding environment with various settings, including templates, libraries, and preprocessors, to enhance productivity.

Possible disadvantages of JS Bin

  • Limited Offline Use
    As a web-based application, JS Bin requires an internet connection to access and use, limiting its functionality in offline scenarios.
  • Performance Constraints
    Complex or heavy projects may experience performance issues as the platform is designed for smaller snippets and quick testing rather than large-scale applications.
  • Security Concerns
    Public sharing of bins can lead to exposure of sensitive code or data. Users need to be cautious about publicly sharing any code with proprietary or confidential information.
  • Limited Backend Capabilities
    JS Bin is focused on front-end development, so it offers minimal support for backend technologies, which may limit its use for full-stack development.
  • Subscription Cost for Premium Features
    Advanced features and additional functionalities often require a paid subscription, which may not be suitable for all users, especially hobbyists or students.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

JS Bin videos

JS Bin saving - a quick explanation

More videos:

  • Review - Customising JS Bin's editor
  • Review - JS Bin - shortcut urls

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and JS Bin)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Programming
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and JS Bin. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CrossBrowserTesting and JS Bin

CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet.
Be the first one to post

JS Bin Reviews

8 Best Replit Alternatives & Competitors in 2022 (Free & Paid) - Software Discover
A live pastebin for HTML, CSS & javascript and a range of processors, including scss, coffeescript, jade and more. JS bin – collaborative javascript debugging.
6 Coding Playgrounds For Web Developers
What sets it apart from the previous playgrounds is that JS Bin allows you to download files to your computer, a nifty feature that may prove useful to developers, especially when fiddling around with code while offline. You can also create private “bins” on JS Bin but you will have to pay for this feature. Unfortunately, at this point, JS Bin doesn’t have a collaboration...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JS Bin should be more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: over 2 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

JS Bin mentions (25)

  • Ask HN: How can I get my 7-year-old started with web development?
    I don't understand why all these comments are against web dev. Creating an html file is quick, easy, and most importantly for kids, you instantly get visual results! You don't even need to open ugly terminal consoles, you could just use something like JS Bin (https://jsbin.com/) or JSFiddle or CodePen. I used to volunteer with CoderDojo, a non-profit that hosted intro to coding workshops for kids of all ages... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    JS Bin: Allows you to save edited code locally or share a URL for collaborative debugging. Supports HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Markdown, Jade, and Sass. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Jsbin.com — JS Bin is another playground and code-sharing site of front-end web (HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It Also supports Markdown, Jade, and Sass). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 best Javascript debugging tools
    JS Bin is one of the useful JavaScript debugging tools designed for developers working with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It gives them the opportunity to test and debug their code snippets in a real-world setting. The fact that this tool is open-source is fantastic. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • <code> + linebreak breaks code segment. <code> without linebreak doesn't.
    If I paste both in jsbin.com, the both show all content on 1 line. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and JS Bin, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

CodePen - A front end web development playground.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

JSFiddle - Test your JavaScript, CSS, HTML or CoffeeScript online with JSFiddle code editor.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Pastebin.com - Pastebin.com is a website where you can store text for a certain period of time.