Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CRI-O VS Commands.dev

Compare CRI-O VS Commands.dev and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CRI-O logo CRI-O

Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes

Commands.dev logo Commands.dev

Commands.
  • CRI-O Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21
  • Commands.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-18

CRI-O features and specs

  • Lightweight
    CRI-O is designed to be a minimal container runtime, which means it has a smaller footprint compared to other runtimes like Docker. This can result in lower memory and CPU usage, contributing to better performance and efficiency.
  • Kubernetes Integration
    CRI-O is built specifically to integrate seamlessly with Kubernetes, implementing the Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface (CRI). This ensures better compatibility and more tailored features for Kubernetes environments.
  • Security
    CRI-O is designed with security in mind and minimizes the attack surface by strictly following the principle of least privilege. It also supports compatibility with various security frameworks, such as SELinux and AppArmor.
  • Vendor Neutral
    CRI-O is an open-source project under the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), meaning it is vendor-neutral and has a diverse community contributing to its development. This decentralization helps in avoiding vendor lock-in.
  • Pluggable CNI
    CRI-O supports Container Network Interface (CNI) plugins out of the box, providing flexibility in choosing different network providers based on specific use-case requirements.

Possible disadvantages of CRI-O

  • Limited Features
    Because CRI-O is designed to be lightweight and minimalist, it lacks some of the extensive features offered by more comprehensive container solutions like Docker. Features like image building may require additional tools.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    While CRI-O is gaining popularity, it does not yet have as robust a community or ecosystem as Docker, potentially resulting in fewer available third-party tools and integrations.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    CRI-O may not be the most beginner-friendly environment due to its specific focus on Kubernetes integration and lack of standalone features like Docker Compose. Newcomers might find the learning curve steeper.
  • Debugging Tools
    The ecosystem around CRI-O is still maturing, and dedicated debugging tools are less comprehensive compared to other container runtimes like Docker, which could pose challenges in troubleshooting.
  • Release Cycle
    CRI-O's release cycle is tightly aligned with Kubernetes releases, which can be a double-edged sword. While it ensures compatibility, it also means that businesses must keep their CRI-O and Kubernetes versions in sync.

Commands.dev features and specs

  • Comprehensive Command Collection
    Commands.dev offers a wide array of pre-built command-line tools and scripts, providing developers with access to potentially time-saving utilities across various domains.
  • Ease of Access
    The platform is designed to be user-friendly, allowing developers to quickly search for and implement commands without needing to navigate through extensive documentation.
  • Open Source
    Being open source allows the community to contribute to and improve the repository of commands, fostering a collaborative environment for development.
  • Up-to-date Resources
    Commands.dev is frequently updated with new commands and improvements, ensuring that developers have access to the latest tools and practices.

Possible disadvantages of Commands.dev

  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with command-line tools may face a learning curve in understanding and implementing the commands effectively.
  • Reliability of Commands
    As with any community-contributed resource, the reliability of some commands may vary, potentially requiring additional verification and testing by the developer.
  • Limited to Supported Platforms
    The utility of commands may depend on the operating system or platform, which might limit their applicability in certain environments.
  • Security Concerns
    Using commands from an open-source repository might expose users to security risks if commands are not adequately vetted or updated against vulnerabilities.

Analysis of CRI-O

Overall verdict

  • CRI-O is considered a good choice for users who are running Kubernetes and prefer a streamlined, Kubernetes-native container runtime. Its compatibility with Kubernetes standards and its focus on using lightweight components make it a reliable option for a Kubernetes environment.

Why this product is good

  • CRI-O is an open-source container runtime specifically focused on providing a lightweight, minimal and stable runtime environment for Kubernetes. It is designed to meet the Container Runtime Interface (CRI) which enables Kubernetes to use different container runtimes. CRI-O simplifies the stack by using existing Open Container Initiative (OCI) projects which reduces overhead and complexity. It benefits from Kubernetes integration, offering security and performance optimizations tailored for Kubernetes workloads.

Recommended for

  • Organizations using Kubernetes as their primary container orchestration system.
  • Teams looking for a minimal and stable runtime compatible with the Kubernetes CRI.
  • Developers who need a runtime that integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes tools and workflows.
  • Projects that prioritize security and compliance with OCI standards.

CRI-O videos

+ Add

Running Containers on Podman/CRI-o - Introduction working with Podman containers

More videos:

  • Tutorial - CRI-O: Development Process & How to Contribute - Urvashi Mohnani & Peter Hunt, Red Hat
  • Review - CRI-O: O Container Runtime feito para o Kubernetes

Commands.dev videos

No Commands.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CRI-O and Commands.dev)

CRI-O

Commands.dev

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Developer Tools
54 54%
Developer Tools
46% 46
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
Terminal Tools
0 0%
Terminal Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CRI-O and Commands.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CRI-O seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CRI-O mentions (21)

  • We clone a running VM in 2 seconds
    Yes - using Cri-o[0] or docker checkpoint/restore api (which uses cri-o) [0] - https://cri-o.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Top 8 Docker Alternatives to Consider in 2025
    CRI-O provides a lightweight container runtime specifically designed for Kubernetes, implementing the Container Runtime Interface (CRI) with optimized performance. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • 7 Best Practices for Container Security
    Container engine security focuses on the underlying runtime system that manages and executes containers, such as Docker, containerd, or CRI-O. These container engines are responsible for interfacing with the operating system kernel to provide the isolated environments that containers run within. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • 5 Alternatives to Docker Desktop
    Minikube supports various container runtimes, including Docker, containerd, and CRI-O, allowing flexibility in the development environment. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • The Road To Kubernetes: How Older Technologies Add Up
    Kubernetes on the backend used to utilize docker for much of its container runtime solutions. One of the modular features of Kubernetes is the ability to utilize a Container Runtime Interface or CRI. The problem was that Docker didn't really meet the spec properly and they had to maintain a shim to translate properly. Instead users could utilize the popular containerd or cri-o runtimes. These follow the Open... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Commands.dev mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Commands.dev yet. Tracking of Commands.dev recommendations started around May 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CRI-O and Commands.dev, you can also consider the following products

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

Shell Notebook - MacOS Terminal, reimagined

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Warp Terminal - The terminal for the 21st century. Warp is a blazingly fast, rust-based terminal reimagined from the ground up to work like a modern app.

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

Hyper - Extensible, cross-platform terminal built on open web standards.

Loading...