CRI-O
containerd
rkt
Podman
Apache Karaf
GlusterFS
REX-Ray
Apache ServiceMix
Ceph
Minio
GlusterFS
StorPool
TrueNAS Core
PetaSAN
BeeGFS
Amahi
Based on our record, CRI-O should be more popular than Ceph. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Kubernetes on the backend used to utilize docker for much of its container runtime solutions. One of the modular features of Kubernetes is the ability to utilize a Container Runtime Interface or CRI. The problem was that Docker didn't really meet the spec properly and they had to maintain a shim to translate properly. Instead users could utilize the popular containerd or cri-o runtimes. These follow the Open... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Multiple container runtimes are supported, like conatinerd, cri-o, or other CRI compliant runtimes. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Install container runtime on all nodes. We will use cri-o. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Container Runtime Interface (CRI) is one of the important parts of the Kubernetes cluster. It is a plugin interface allowing kubelet to use different container runtimes. And recently CRI-O container runtime has been announced as a CNCF Graduated project. I thought of writing a blog on CRI-O and how to set up a single-node Kubernetes cluster with Kubeadm and CRI-O. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
CRI-O: This is an open-source container runtime designed for use with Kubernetes. It is a lightweight and stable environment for containers. It also complies with the Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface (CRI), making it easy to integrate with Kubernetes. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Ceph stands out in storage technology, offering a scalable and reliable solution where traditional systems fall short. It supports object, block, and file storage in one system, adaptable for various environments including on-premises, cloud, or container-native setups. Key benefits include scalability, enabled by the CRUSH algorithm, allowing for expansion without typical downtime. This makes Ceph suitable for... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
With that being said, you better take a look at something more WAN optimized and more secure, like S3 storage. You can build the S3 storage (and gain immutability) using something like MinIO (https://min.io/) or Ceph (https://ceph.io/en/) or check out Object First Ootbi offerings - https://objectfirst.com/object-storage/ (I work for them). Source: 10 months ago
I believe Ceph [1] could be a good alternative. It can be self hosted and I believe some cloud providers also offer it. Here are some differences between S3 and Ceph [2]. [1] - https://ceph.io/en/ [2] - https://www.lightbitslabs.com/blog/ceph-storage/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Another option is a distributed Ceph cluster https://ceph.io/en/. Source: over 1 year ago
There's also cool systems like https://ceph.io/en/ that could be efficient if willing to set up and learn. Source: almost 2 years ago
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.
rkt - App Container runtime
GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
StorPool - StorPool is designed from the ground up to provide cloud builders, shared hosting providers and MSPs with the most resource efficient storage software on the market.
