Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CRI-O VS Amazon API Gateway

Compare CRI-O VS Amazon API Gateway and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CRI-O logo CRI-O

Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes

Amazon API Gateway logo Amazon API Gateway

Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale
  • CRI-O Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21
  • Amazon API Gateway Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12

CRI-O features and specs

  • Lightweight
    CRI-O is designed to be a minimal container runtime, which means it has a smaller footprint compared to other runtimes like Docker. This can result in lower memory and CPU usage, contributing to better performance and efficiency.
  • Kubernetes Integration
    CRI-O is built specifically to integrate seamlessly with Kubernetes, implementing the Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface (CRI). This ensures better compatibility and more tailored features for Kubernetes environments.
  • Security
    CRI-O is designed with security in mind and minimizes the attack surface by strictly following the principle of least privilege. It also supports compatibility with various security frameworks, such as SELinux and AppArmor.
  • Vendor Neutral
    CRI-O is an open-source project under the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), meaning it is vendor-neutral and has a diverse community contributing to its development. This decentralization helps in avoiding vendor lock-in.
  • Pluggable CNI
    CRI-O supports Container Network Interface (CNI) plugins out of the box, providing flexibility in choosing different network providers based on specific use-case requirements.

Possible disadvantages of CRI-O

  • Limited Features
    Because CRI-O is designed to be lightweight and minimalist, it lacks some of the extensive features offered by more comprehensive container solutions like Docker. Features like image building may require additional tools.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    While CRI-O is gaining popularity, it does not yet have as robust a community or ecosystem as Docker, potentially resulting in fewer available third-party tools and integrations.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    CRI-O may not be the most beginner-friendly environment due to its specific focus on Kubernetes integration and lack of standalone features like Docker Compose. Newcomers might find the learning curve steeper.
  • Debugging Tools
    The ecosystem around CRI-O is still maturing, and dedicated debugging tools are less comprehensive compared to other container runtimes like Docker, which could pose challenges in troubleshooting.
  • Release Cycle
    CRI-O's release cycle is tightly aligned with Kubernetes releases, which can be a double-edged sword. While it ensures compatibility, it also means that businesses must keep their CRI-O and Kubernetes versions in sync.

Amazon API Gateway features and specs

  • Scalability
    API Gateway automatically scales to handle the number of requests your API receives, ensuring high availability and reliability.
  • Ease of Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like Lambda, DynamoDB, and IAM, enabling a cohesive environment for developing serverless applications.
  • Built-in Security
    Provides features such as IAM roles, API keys, and AWS WAF integration for safeguarding your APIs from potential threats.
  • Monitoring and Logging
    Supports CloudWatch integration for monitoring API requests and responses, helping you maintain observability and troubleshoot issues effectively.
  • Cost-Effective
    You only pay for the requests made to your APIs and the amount of data transferred out, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
  • Caching
    Built-in caching at the API Gateway level can improve performance and reduce latency for frequently accessed data.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon API Gateway

  • Complexity in Configuration
    Setting up and managing API Gateway can be complex, especially for users who are not familiar with AWS services and cloud infrastructure.
  • Cold Start Latency
    When integrated with AWS Lambda, cold starts can introduce latency which can affect the performance of your API.
  • Cost for High Throughput
    While cost-effective for low to moderate usage, the costs can escalate with high throughput and large data transfers.
  • Debugging Issues
    Diagnosis can be complicated due to the multi-tenant nature of the service and the need to dive into multiple AWS logs and services.
  • Limited Customization
    There might be constraints regarding customizations and fine-tuning your APIs compared to self-hosting solutions.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Dependence on AWS infrastructure can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to other cloud providers or solutions.

Analysis of CRI-O

Overall verdict

  • CRI-O is considered a good choice for users who are running Kubernetes and prefer a streamlined, Kubernetes-native container runtime. Its compatibility with Kubernetes standards and its focus on using lightweight components make it a reliable option for a Kubernetes environment.

Why this product is good

  • CRI-O is an open-source container runtime specifically focused on providing a lightweight, minimal and stable runtime environment for Kubernetes. It is designed to meet the Container Runtime Interface (CRI) which enables Kubernetes to use different container runtimes. CRI-O simplifies the stack by using existing Open Container Initiative (OCI) projects which reduces overhead and complexity. It benefits from Kubernetes integration, offering security and performance optimizations tailored for Kubernetes workloads.

Recommended for

  • Organizations using Kubernetes as their primary container orchestration system.
  • Teams looking for a minimal and stable runtime compatible with the Kubernetes CRI.
  • Developers who need a runtime that integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes tools and workflows.
  • Projects that prioritize security and compliance with OCI standards.

Analysis of Amazon API Gateway

Overall verdict

  • Amazon API Gateway is considered a good choice for businesses and developers who are looking for a reliable and scalable API management solution, especially if they are already using other AWS services.

Why this product is good

  • Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service that makes it easy for developers to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. It is highly scalable, offers robust features like automatic security patches, supports multiple authentication mechanisms, and integrates seamlessly with other AWS services. Additionally, it provides detailed monitoring and logging, which facilitates effective API management.

Recommended for

  • Developers building serverless applications on AWS, particularly with AWS Lambda.
  • Organizations that require secure, scalable, and highly available APIs.
  • Businesses seeking seamless integrations within the AWS ecosystem.
  • Teams that need detailed monitoring, logging, and security features for their APIs.

CRI-O videos

+ Add

Running Containers on Podman/CRI-o - Introduction working with Podman containers

More videos:

  • Tutorial - CRI-O: Development Process & How to Contribute - Urvashi Mohnani & Peter Hunt, Red Hat
  • Review - CRI-O: O Container Runtime feito para o Kubernetes

Amazon API Gateway videos

+ Add

Building APIs with Amazon API Gateway

More videos:

  • Review - Create API using AWS API Gateway service - Amazon API Gateway p1

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CRI-O and Amazon API Gateway)

CRI-O

Amazon API Gateway

Cloud Computing
48 48%
Cloud Computing
52% 52
API Tools
0 0%
API Tools
100% 100
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
APIs
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CRI-O and Amazon API Gateway. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon API Gateway should be more popular than CRI-O. It has been mentiond 108 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CRI-O mentions (21)

  • We clone a running VM in 2 seconds
    Yes - using Cri-o[0] or docker checkpoint/restore api (which uses cri-o) [0] - https://cri-o.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Top 8 Docker Alternatives to Consider in 2025
    CRI-O provides a lightweight container runtime specifically designed for Kubernetes, implementing the Container Runtime Interface (CRI) with optimized performance. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • 7 Best Practices for Container Security
    Container engine security focuses on the underlying runtime system that manages and executes containers, such as Docker, containerd, or CRI-O. These container engines are responsible for interfacing with the operating system kernel to provide the isolated environments that containers run within. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • 5 Alternatives to Docker Desktop
    Minikube supports various container runtimes, including Docker, containerd, and CRI-O, allowing flexibility in the development environment. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • The Road To Kubernetes: How Older Technologies Add Up
    Kubernetes on the backend used to utilize docker for much of its container runtime solutions. One of the modular features of Kubernetes is the ability to utilize a Container Runtime Interface or CRI. The problem was that Docker didn't really meet the spec properly and they had to maintain a shim to translate properly. Instead users could utilize the popular containerd or cri-o runtimes. These follow the Open... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Amazon API Gateway mentions (108)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CRI-O and Amazon API Gateway, you can also consider the following products

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

Apigee - Intelligent and complete API platform

Loading...