Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrateDB VS Microsoft SQL

Compare CrateDB VS Microsoft SQL and see what are their differences

CrateDB logo CrateDB

The Hyper-Fast Database that Truly Scales

Microsoft SQL logo Microsoft SQL

Microsoft SQL is a best in class relational database management software that facilitates the database server to provide you a primary function to store and retrieve data.
  • CrateDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28

Store any type of data and combine the simplicity of SQL with the scalability of NoSQL. CrateDB is an open source distributed database running queries in milliseconds, whatever the complexity, volume and velocity of data.

  • Microsoft SQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-26

CrateDB features and specs

  • Scalability
    CrateDB is designed to handle large volumes of data and can easily scale horizontally by adding more nodes to a cluster, which helps in achieving high availability and load distribution.
  • Real-time SQL Queries
    It supports real-time SQL queries on structured and unstructured data, allowing users to perform powerful analytics with familiar SQL syntax.
  • Ease of Use
    CrateDB provides an approachable interface for developers and data scientists, combining NoSQL and SQL benefits, including full-text search and time series data handling.
  • Distributed Architecture
    Its distributed architecture ensures high fault tolerance and resilience, as data is replicated across nodes.
  • Dynamic Schema
    The support for dynamic schema makes it easier for applications to evolve without the need for expensive schema migrations.

Possible disadvantages of CrateDB

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established databases like PostgreSQL or MySQL, CrateDB has a smaller ecosystem of third-party tools and community support.
  • Complexity of Management
    Managing a distributed database system like CrateDB can be complex, requiring a good understanding of its architecture and deployment processes.
  • Memory Usage
    CrateDB can be memory-intensive, especially under high load or with complex queries, potentially necessitating significant hardware resources.
  • Maturity
    As a relatively newer database technology, CrateDB might lack some of the maturity and battle-tested features found in older, more established databases.
  • Advanced Features
    While CrateDB covers many use cases well, certain advanced database features present in specialized databases might be less optimized or absent.

Microsoft SQL features and specs

  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    SQL Server offers a wide range of features including advanced analytics, in-memory capabilities, robust security measures, and integration services.
  • High Performance
    With in-memory OLTP and support for persistent memory technologies, SQL Server provides high transaction and query performance.
  • Scalability
    SQL Server can scale from small installations on single machines to large, data-intensive applications requiring high throughput and storage.
  • Security
    SQL Server offers advanced security features like encryption, dynamic data masking, and advanced threat protection, ensuring data safety and compliance.
  • Integrations
    It easily integrates with other Microsoft products such as Azure, Power BI, and Active Directory, providing a cohesive ecosystem for enterprise solutions.
  • Developer Friendly
    It supports a wide range of development tools and languages including .NET, Python, Java, and more, making it highly versatile for developers.
  • High Availability
    Features like Always On availability groups and failover clustering provide high availability and disaster recovery options for critical applications.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft SQL

  • Cost
    SQL Server can be expensive, particularly for the Enterprise edition. Licensing costs can add up quickly depending on the features and scale required.
  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive feature set, SQL Server can be complex to configure and manage, requiring skilled administrators and developers.
  • Resource Intensive
    SQL Server can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial hardware resources for optimal performance, which can increase overall operational costs.
  • Windows-Centric
    While SQL Server can run on Linux, it is primarily optimized for and tightly integrated with the Windows ecosystem, which may not suit all organizations.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Being a proprietary solution, it can cause vendor lock-in, making it challenging to switch to alternative database systems without significant migration efforts.

Analysis of Microsoft SQL

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Microsoft SQL Server is generally regarded as a good choice for database management, particularly for organizations that require high performance, reliability, and seamless integration with other Microsoft technologies.

Why this product is good

  • Microsoft SQL Server is considered a robust database management system because of its comprehensive features such as high scalability, strong security, and excellent integration with other Microsoft products. It provides tools for data mining, warehousing, and analytics, making it a popular choice for enterprises. Additionally, it offers high availability and disaster recovery solutions, and its active community provides extensive support and resources.

Recommended for

  • Enterprises
  • Businesses using Microsoft ecosystems
  • Organizations requiring robust data security
  • Users needing scalability for large datasets
  • Projects needing high availability and disaster recovery

CrateDB videos

CrateDB is the ideal database for IoT solutions

More videos:

  • Review - Getting started with CrateDB Cloud on Azure

Microsoft SQL videos

3.1 Microsoft SQL Server Review

More videos:

  • Review - What is Microsoft SQL Server?
  • Review - Querying Microsoft SQL Server (T-SQL) | Udemy Instructor, Phillip Burton [bestseller]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrateDB and Microsoft SQL)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
4 4%
96% 96
Relational Databases
2 2%
98% 98
Tech
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CrateDB and Microsoft SQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrateDB seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrateDB mentions (1)

  • Build a data ingestion pipeline using Kafka, Flink, and CrateDB
    Kafka is the front line of the stack, used to queue messages received from (for example) IoT sensors and devices. CrateDB will query and store the data. And between CrateDB and Kafka, it lives Apache Flink, a data processing engine. These three tools are all distributed systems that provide elastic scaling, fault tolerance, high-throughput, and low-latency performance via parallel processing. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Microsoft SQL mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft SQL yet. Tracking of Microsoft SQL recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrateDB and Microsoft SQL, you can also consider the following products

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

MySQL - The world's most popular open source database

Prisma Schema Builder - Prisma Schema Builder is an attempt to build a visual tool for constructing Prisma database schemas.

PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

Arctype - Free SQL Client for developers and teams. Available for Mac, Windows, Linux, and Web.

SQLite - SQLite Home Page