Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrateDB VS Materialize CSS

Compare CrateDB VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

CrateDB logo CrateDB

The Hyper-Fast Database that Truly Scales

Materialize CSS logo Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design
  • CrateDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28

Store any type of data and combine the simplicity of SQL with the scalability of NoSQL. CrateDB is an open source distributed database running queries in milliseconds, whatever the complexity, volume and velocity of data.

  • Materialize CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-14

CrateDB features and specs

  • Scalability
    CrateDB is designed to handle large volumes of data and can easily scale horizontally by adding more nodes to a cluster, which helps in achieving high availability and load distribution.
  • Real-time SQL Queries
    It supports real-time SQL queries on structured and unstructured data, allowing users to perform powerful analytics with familiar SQL syntax.
  • Ease of Use
    CrateDB provides an approachable interface for developers and data scientists, combining NoSQL and SQL benefits, including full-text search and time series data handling.
  • Distributed Architecture
    Its distributed architecture ensures high fault tolerance and resilience, as data is replicated across nodes.
  • Dynamic Schema
    The support for dynamic schema makes it easier for applications to evolve without the need for expensive schema migrations.

Possible disadvantages of CrateDB

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established databases like PostgreSQL or MySQL, CrateDB has a smaller ecosystem of third-party tools and community support.
  • Complexity of Management
    Managing a distributed database system like CrateDB can be complex, requiring a good understanding of its architecture and deployment processes.
  • Memory Usage
    CrateDB can be memory-intensive, especially under high load or with complex queries, potentially necessitating significant hardware resources.
  • Maturity
    As a relatively newer database technology, CrateDB might lack some of the maturity and battle-tested features found in older, more established databases.
  • Advanced Features
    While CrateDB covers many use cases well, certain advanced database features present in specialized databases might be less optimized or absent.

Materialize CSS features and specs

  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages of Materialize CSS

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

Analysis of Materialize CSS

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

CrateDB videos

CrateDB is the ideal database for IoT solutions

More videos:

  • Review - Getting started with CrateDB Cloud on Azure

Materialize CSS videos

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrateDB and Materialize CSS)
Developer Tools
5 5%
95% 95
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Tech
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CrateDB and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CrateDB and Materialize CSS

CrateDB Reviews

We have no reviews of CrateDB yet.
Be the first one to post

Materialize CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Material Design is a design language that combines classic principles of successful design with innovation and technology. One of the downsides of Materialize is that it does not support older versions of web browsers, and sometimes it does not handle certain nestings of components properly, resulting in an odd appearance.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Materialize is a modern responsive front-end framework based on the Material Design principles of Google. Material design is a design language created by Google, which combines traditional design methods with innovations and technology.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Created by Google in 2014, Materialize is a responsive UI framework for websites and Android apps. It provides many ready-to-use components, classes, and starter templates. It is compatible with Sass and has a responsive layout based on Bootstrap’s 12-column grid format. The best part? Its extensive color palettes. So, if you want to work with Material Design (Google’s...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
It’s specifically designed to help you develop faster using a standard template and customizable components. As the name suggests, Materialize is based on the basic principles of Material Design.
10 of the Best Bootstrap Alternatives
Materialize is a Design-inspired front-end framework that offers everything you need to create beautiful websites and apps. It includes a responsive grid system, CSS components, and animation libraries. Materialize is also easy to use and customizable, making it the perfect choice for any project. Furthermore, a single basic responsive framework across all phases minimizes...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be a lot more popular than CrateDB. While we know about 26 links to Materialize CSS, we've tracked only 1 mention of CrateDB. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrateDB mentions (1)

  • Build a data ingestion pipeline using Kafka, Flink, and CrateDB
    Kafka is the front line of the stack, used to queue messages received from (for example) IoT sensors and devices. CrateDB will query and store the data. And between CrateDB and Kafka, it lives Apache Flink, a data processing engine. These three tools are all distributed systems that provide elastic scaling, fault tolerance, high-throughput, and low-latency performance via parallel processing. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Materialize CSS mentions (26)

  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it integrates animations and components to provide feedback to users. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Front-end Framework: Comparing Bootstrap, Foundation and Materialize
    Materialize was created by a team of developers at Google, inspired by the principles of Material Design. Material Design is a design language developed by Google that emphasizes tactile surfaces, realistic lighting, and bold, graphic interfaces. Materialize aims to bring these principles to web development by providing a framework with ready-to-use components and styles based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Took a web development job without much experience, am I doomed?
    If you wanna make it look nice use materialize css works great with Django templates. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Best 3 Bootstrap Alternatives
    You can also visit the Materialize website and GitHub repository which currently has garnered over 38k likes and has been forked over 4k times by developers. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • All About Hacktober Fest 2022 You Need To Know
    This repository consists of files required to deploy a Web App or PWA created with Materialize Css. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrateDB and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Prisma Schema Builder - Prisma Schema Builder is an attempt to build a visual tool for constructing Prisma database schemas.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Arctype - Free SQL Client for developers and teams. Available for Mac, Windows, Linux, and Web.

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world