Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CP.center VS autoComplete.js

Compare CP.center VS autoComplete.js and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

CP.center logo CP.center

User-friendly automated practical assessments for IT and security recruitment with 50 job profiles and library of 130000 practical questions and tasks.

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.
  • CP.center One of job profiles
    One of job profiles //
    2025-03-27
  • CP.center Example of assessment practical task - code writing
    Example of assessment practical task - code writing //
    2025-03-27
  • CP.center Automated post-assessment report
    Automated post-assessment report //
    2025-03-27

Cyber Proficiency Assessments is a SaaS platform enhances recruitment processes in Cybersecurity and IT, reducing costs and minimizing the time and effort experts spend on candidate evaluations. This solution combines highly automated practical skills assessments using lightweight cyber range capabilities with high-quality practical tasks and theoretical questions created by domain experts. It offers great flexibility, allowing recruitment profiles to be built on the fly with any combination of skills from existing topics and can integrate with other technical platforms via API.

The benefits:

  • Expert domain knowledge: Top-quality content prepared by IT and Cybersecurity experts.
  • Easy to use: Intuitive interface. Select profile, send link to assessment, see the final report.
  • Practical tasks: Measure not only knowledge but also practical skills.
  • Large database of questions, tasks and profiles: 70 Cybersecurity IT job profiles built using 140 different categories containing 130k+ questions tasks.
  • Automation: Created in an automation-centric manner and delivered in SaaS model.
  • Low costs: Due to high automation and efficient engineering.
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12

CP.center

Website
cp.center
Pricing URL
Official CP.center Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $10.0 / One-off (Single assessment)
Platforms
Web
Release Date
2024 June
Startup details
Country
Poland
Employees
1 - 9
Edit details

autoComplete.js

Website
tarekraafat.github.io
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

CP.center features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CP.center and autoComplete.js)

CP.center

autoComplete.js

Hiring And Recruitment
100 100%
Hiring And Recruitment
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Online Learning
100 100%
Online Learning
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CP.center and autoComplete.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CP.center and autoComplete.js, you can also consider the following products

iMocha - Make intelligent talent decisions.

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

HackerRank - HackerRank is a platform that allows companies to conduct interviews remotely to hire developers and for technical assessment purposes.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

HackerEarth - HackerEarth is the network of top developers across the world. They connect to start-ups, tech companies, organizations and discover the best developer jobs. They participate in programming challenges and compete against other top developers.

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Loading...