Coveralls VS BetterCloud

Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Also for my last employer, I contributed to their private repo by building a web app that can allow People team to orchestrate IT on/off boarding tasks similar to a tool like (BetterCloud) but built in house. Source: over 1 year ago

It's also called "SaaS management" or "software asset management" e.g. zylo.com bettercloud.com or blissfully.com. Source: over 2 years ago

Many mid-to-large sized organizations use BetterCloud to manage their Google Workspaces. If you use many SaaS products, you can probably manage most of them through their platform. Source: over 2 years ago