Software Alternatives & Reviews

Courier VS RabbitMQ

Compare Courier VS RabbitMQ and see what are their differences

Courier logo Courier

Courier is a notification API built for developers. Design once, and deliver to any channel – email, Slack, SMS, push, and more – all through a single API.

RabbitMQ logo RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
  • Courier Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-06
  • RabbitMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Courier videos

The Courier.com Notifications API Demo

RabbitMQ videos

數據工程 | 快速review | 如何架設Docker Swarm + RabbitMQ??

More videos:

  • Review - What's New in RabbitMQ—June 2012 Edition
  • Review - Feature complete: Uncovering the true cost different RabbitMQ features and configs - Jack Vanlightly

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Courier and RabbitMQ)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Push Notifications
100 100%
0% 0
Web Service Automation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Courier and RabbitMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Courier and RabbitMQ

Courier Reviews

6 Best Notification Infrastructure for Modern Applications
Courier follows the Design Once Deliver to Many approaches, which makes it possible to design notifications using a single API and deliver them to several channels such as push notifications, direct messages for Slack or Facebook Messenger, SMS, and email. That eliminates the need to integrate APIs for each provider separately.
Source: geekflare.com

RabbitMQ Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker software that allows applications to communicate with each other using a messaging protocol. It was developed by Rabbit Technologies and first released in 2007, which was later acquired by VMware.RabbitMQ is based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and provides a reliable, scalable, and interoperable messaging system.
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
However, it's important to note that every tool has its strengths and use cases. For instance, Kafka's strength lies in real-time data streaming, NATS shines with its simplicity, and RabbitMQ provides support for complex routing. In contrast, IronMQ provides an excellent balance of simplicity, durability, scalability, and ease of management, making it a powerful choice for...
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
RabbitMQ follows a standard store-and-forward pattern, allowing messages to be stored in RAM, on disk, or both. To ensure the persistence of messages, the producer can tag them as persistent, and they will be stored in a separate queue. This helps achieve message retention even after a restart or failure of the RabbitMQ server.
Source: gcore.com
6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Due to RabbitMQ’s lightweight design, it can be easily deployed on public and private clouds. RabbitMQ is backed not only by a robust support system but also offers a great developer community. Since it is open-source software it is one of the best Kafka Alternatives and RabbitMQ is free of cost.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
In this article, we will discuss an overview on RabbitMQ Alternatives. RabbitMQ has a flexible messaging system and functions as a multipurpose broker. But it often stops working, because of its high latency and very slow while doing so. The deployment & management of RabbitMQ is a too dull procedure. It can not be installed as modules, it can be installed only on machines...
Source: gokicker.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Courier should be more popular than RabbitMQ. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Courier mentions (3)

  • The application I used to get into YC as a solo founder and no revenue, AMA
    Background: I'm the solo founder of Courier (courier.com). We build APIs that help developers easily build notifications for their products for any channel - email, SMS, Slack, push, inbox, etc. These days we're ~40 people, Series B, with almost $50M raised from Google Ventures, Bessemer Venture Partners, Matrix Partners, Twilio, Slack, and a bunch of amazing angels. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Push Notifications: 3rd Party Service vs Roll Your Own
    Roll your own like me so far, or do you use 3rd-party notification tools like Courier or Knock? Source: about 1 year ago
  • Develop a Cryptocurrency Tracking WebApp with Instant Email Notifications
    Courier is ideal for this kind of application since it makes it simple to integrate notification systems. We will be using the Courier API to send email notifications for now, but it is quite easy to extend it to use SMS or other communication channels. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

RabbitMQ mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Courier and RabbitMQ, you can also consider the following products

Knock App - Power your product notifications with Segment and Hightouch.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Novu - The ultimate library for managing multi-channel transactional notifications with a single API.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

SuprSend - Single Notification API for Every Channel (SMS, Slack, Whatsapp, Email, SMS, Push, App Inbox)

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.